Mechanical Circulatory Support on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Advanced Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: State of the Art

Ischemic cardiomyopathy is defined as coronary artery disease accompanied by left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction equal to or less than 40%. The substrate of ischemic cardiomyopathy is heterogeneous, characterized by the coexistence of normal, stunned, hibernating, and scarred myocardium within the same myocardial region. Altogether, these components may represent different phases of a single pathological process. It is well-established that the assessment of isolated myocardial viability and ischemia alone has failed to reliably guide the indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CABG in patients with low ejection fraction carries a significant risk of perioperative mortality and morbidity, largely related to the development of postcardiotomy shock. Preoperative optimization with pharmacologic or mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often essential; the decision requires integrating multiple complex factors, including clinical presentation, response to optimization therapy, myocardial viability, the presence of hibernating or scarred myocardium, left ventricular end-systolic volume index, coronary angiography findings, hemodynamic assessment, and the Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Index score. A preoperative evaluation that incorporates anatomical, morphological, functional, and hemodynamic domains enables more precise selection and timing of MCS. Preemptive left ventricular unloading mitigates the physiological impact of cardiopulmonary bypass, preserves end-organ perfusion, and reduces the need for high-dose vasopressors. However, the risk–benefit ratio remains uncertain and may be associated with serious complications. Careful judgment regarding the indications for MCS has the potential to enhance the safety of CABG in high-risk patients, but robust, long-term, prospective studies are needed to determine its true impact on clinical outcomes. In this review, we will examine the indications and criteria for the use of MCS in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy, as well as the various devices available for preoperative or intraoperative support, including technical considerations, advantages and disadvantages, and associated complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62040638
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical Circulatory Support on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Advanced Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: State of the Art

Sasha Still, Kyle W. Eudailey, Erik J. Orozco-Hernández, Clifton Lewis et al.
Medicina
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Mechanical Circulatory Support on Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Advanced Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: State of the Art

Sasha Still, Kyle W. Eudailey, Erik J. Orozco-Hernández, Clifton Lewis, Venkateswaran Rajamiyer, Panos Vardas, William Holman, James E. Davies
article en

Abstract

Ischemic cardiomyopathy is defined as coronary artery disease accompanied by left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction equal to or less than 40%. The substrate of ischemic cardiomyopathy is heterogeneous, characterized by the coexistence of normal, stunned, hibernating, and scarred myocardium within the same myocardial region. Altogether, these components may represent different phases of a single pathological process. It is well-established that the assessment of isolated myocardial viability and ischemia alone has failed to reliably guide the indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CABG in patients with low ejection fraction carries a significant risk of perioperative mortality and morbidity, largely related to the development of postcardiotomy shock. Preoperative optimization with pharmacologic or mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often essential; the decision requires integrating multiple complex factors, including clinical presentation, response to optimization therapy, myocardial viability, the presence of hibernating or scarred myocardium, left ventricular end-systolic volume index, coronary angiography findings, hemodynamic assessment, and the Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Index score. A preoperative evaluation that incorporates anatomical, morphological, functional, and hemodynamic domains enables more precise selection and timing of MCS. Preemptive left ventricular unloading mitigates the physiological impact of cardiopulmonary bypass, preserves end-organ perfusion, and reduces the need for high-dose vasopressors. However, the risk–benefit ratio remains uncertain and may be associated with serious complications. Careful judgment regarding the indications for MCS has the potential to enhance the safety of CABG in high-risk patients, but robust, long-term, prospective studies are needed to determine its true impact on clinical outcomes. In this review, we will examine the indications and criteria for the use of MCS in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy, as well as the various devices available for preoperative or intraoperative support, including technical considerations, advantages and disadvantages, and associated complications.

MedicinaVol. 62(4)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.