Lower versus standard dose-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes of lower continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) dose-intensity compared with guideline-directed standard dose-intensity CRRT. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to September 19, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of adults with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving CRRT. The primary exposure was delivered lower dose-intensity CRRT (< 20 mL/kg/hr) compared with guideline-directed standard dose-intensity CRRT (≥ 20–40 mL/kg/hr). The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. (CRD420251135606) Fourteen studies (3 RCTs, 11 cohorts) comprising 5,318 patients were included. RCTs had moderate risk of bias, whereas most cohort studies had serious risk. Lower CRRT dose-intensity was associated with decreased ICU mortality (6 studies) compared with standard dose-intensity (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60–0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 26.9%; very low certainty). However, sensitivity analysis based on a Hartung-Knapp Sidik-Jonkmann model showed no difference in ICU mortality between groups (OR 0.77 [95% CI; p = 0.10, 0.55–1.08]). There were no significant differences between groups for dialysis duration, dialysis dependence at discharge, hospital LOS, or mechanical ventilation duration. In a subgroup analysis, a very low dose-intensity group (< 13 mL/kg/hr) was associated with an increased risk in 90-day mortality (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.31–2.24; p < 0.001, I2 = 0%; very low certainty). Among critically ill adults with AKI receiving CRRT, lower dose-intensity therapy was not associated with increased ICU mortality. Other key clinical endpoints were comparable, based on very low certainty of evidence. These findings support further research to investigate the impact of lower CRRT dose-intensity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-05987-x
Primary Topic
Acute Kidney Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lower versus standard dose-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prit Kusirisin, Sean M. Bagshaw, A Zarbock, Nuttha Lumlertgul et al.
Critical Care
Acute Kidney Injury Research
article

Lower versus standard dose-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prit Kusirisin, Sean M. Bagshaw, A Zarbock, Nuttha Lumlertgul, Tomoko Fujii, Ron Wald, Janice Y. Kung, D’Arcy Duquette
article en

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate clinical outcomes of lower continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) dose-intensity compared with guideline-directed standard dose-intensity CRRT. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to September 19, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of adults with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving CRRT. The primary exposure was delivered lower dose-intensity CRRT (< 20 mL/kg/hr) compared with guideline-directed standard dose-intensity CRRT (≥ 20–40 mL/kg/hr). The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) mortality. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. (CRD420251135606) Fourteen studies (3 RCTs, 11 cohorts) comprising 5,318 patients were included. RCTs had moderate risk of bias, whereas most cohort studies had serious risk. Lower CRRT dose-intensity was associated with decreased ICU mortality (6 studies) compared with standard dose-intensity (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60–0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 26.9%; very low certainty). However, sensitivity analysis based on a Hartung-Knapp Sidik-Jonkmann model showed no difference in ICU mortality between groups (OR 0.77 [95% CI; p = 0.10, 0.55–1.08]). There were no significant differences between groups for dialysis duration, dialysis dependence at discharge, hospital LOS, or mechanical ventilation duration. In a subgroup analysis, a very low dose-intensity group (< 13 mL/kg/hr) was associated with an increased risk in 90-day mortality (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.31–2.24; p < 0.001, I2 = 0%; very low certainty). Among critically ill adults with AKI receiving CRRT, lower dose-intensity therapy was not associated with increased ICU mortality. Other key clinical endpoints were comparable, based on very low certainty of evidence. These findings support further research to investigate the impact of lower CRRT dose-intensity.

Critical Care
Jikei University School of Medicine (JP), Alberta Health Services (CA), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH), University Hospital Münster (DE), Chiang Mai University (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Acute Kidney Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.