718 - BJS Prize entrant: <i>the Society of University Surgeons (USA) Prize Winner</i> : durable left ventricular assist device in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation: the United States experience

Abstract Background This study evaluates outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation in recipients with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Methods UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients of isolated DCD heart transplantation between 1/1/2019–3/31/2023. The recipients were stratified by durable LVAD use as a bridge to transplantation. The primary outcome was 1-year post-transplant survival. Sub-group analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of transplant status, device type, and donor type on 1-year survival. Results 703 recipients were included, of which 219 (31.2%) recipients were bridged with a durable LVAD. The recipients of DCD hearts with durable LVADs had significantly lower 1-year post-transplant survival compared to those without durable LVADs (88.4% versus 93.6%, P = 0.017). Among the recipients bridged with durable LVADs, status 4 recipients had significantly improved 1-year survival compared to statuses 2 and 3 recipients, similar to those without durable LVADs. Furthermore, the recipients with HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 had improved survival compared to those with the HeartWare HVAD, similar to those without durable LVADs. Lastly, the DCD and DBD recipients with durable LVADs had comparable 1-year survival (88.4 versus 89.0%, P = 0.763). Conclusions Recipients of DCD hearts bridged to transplantation with a durable LVAD exhibit reduced early post-transplant survival compared to those without a durable LVAD. However, clinical acuity and device type significantly influence post-transplant outcomes in this vulnerable population. Despite this, candidates with a durable LVAD can safely undergo DCD heart transplantation, achieving early post-transplant survival comparable to those of DBD heart transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.013
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

718 - BJS Prize entrant: the Society of University Surgeons (USA) Prize Winner : durable left ventricular assist device in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation: the United States experience

Mary Keebler, Nidhi Iyanna, Yeahwa Hong, Umar Nasim et al.
British journal of surgery
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

718 - BJS Prize entrant: the Society of University Surgeons (USA) Prize Winner : durable left ventricular assist device in donation after circulatory death heart transplantation: the United States experience

Mary Keebler, Nidhi Iyanna, Yeahwa Hong, Umar Nasim, Edward T. Horn Pharm.D, Ander Dorken-Gallastegi, Gavin W. Hickey, David J Kaczorowski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background This study evaluates outcomes following donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation in recipients with a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Methods UNOS registry was queried to analyze adult recipients of isolated DCD heart transplantation between 1/1/2019–3/31/2023. The recipients were stratified by durable LVAD use as a bridge to transplantation. The primary outcome was 1-year post-transplant survival. Sub-group analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of transplant status, device type, and donor type on 1-year survival. Results 703 recipients were included, of which 219 (31.2%) recipients were bridged with a durable LVAD. The recipients of DCD hearts with durable LVADs had significantly lower 1-year post-transplant survival compared to those without durable LVADs (88.4% versus 93.6%, P = 0.017). Among the recipients bridged with durable LVADs, status 4 recipients had significantly improved 1-year survival compared to statuses 2 and 3 recipients, similar to those without durable LVADs. Furthermore, the recipients with HeartMate II and HeartMate 3 had improved survival compared to those with the HeartWare HVAD, similar to those without durable LVADs. Lastly, the DCD and DBD recipients with durable LVADs had comparable 1-year survival (88.4 versus 89.0%, P = 0.763). Conclusions Recipients of DCD hearts bridged to transplantation with a durable LVAD exhibit reduced early post-transplant survival compared to those without a durable LVAD. However, clinical acuity and device type significantly influence post-transplant outcomes in this vulnerable population. Despite this, candidates with a durable LVAD can safely undergo DCD heart transplantation, achieving early post-transplant survival comparable to those of DBD heart transplantation.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.