Machine Learning Prediction of BCS Superconductors without BCS Theory

We show that machine learning (ML) approaches can expedite the future discoveries of BCS superconductors, providing a faster computationally inexpensive alternative to density functional theory for estimating whether a material is a BCS superconductor. The key to the technological applications of superconductors is the superconducting critical temperature. Although the electron pairing mechanism for unconventional superconductors is not known, the pairing mechanism for BCS superconductors is well understood by the Eliashberg function and the McMillan equation. Nevertheless, the first-principles calculations needed are exceedingly expensive. For this reason, a rapid screening of candidate BCS superconductors and their Tc using first-principles calculations is prohibitive. We leverage machine learning to eliminate the need for first-principles calculations when predicting whether or not a material is a BCS superconductor. A database of experimentally relevant crystal structure data is carefully curated and materials descriptors suitable for describing the experimental data are chosen. Machine learning models are trained to classify if a material is a BCS superconductor. This framework provides a roadmap for accelerating the discovery of novel BCS superconductors without BCS theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c13305
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Prediction of BCS Superconductors without BCS Theory

Yoshiharu Krockenberger, Dylan Sheils, Trevor David Rhone
ACS Omega
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Machine Learning Prediction of BCS Superconductors without BCS Theory

Yoshiharu Krockenberger, Dylan Sheils, Trevor David Rhone
article en

Abstract

We show that machine learning (ML) approaches can expedite the future discoveries of BCS superconductors, providing a faster computationally inexpensive alternative to density functional theory for estimating whether a material is a BCS superconductor. The key to the technological applications of superconductors is the superconducting critical temperature. Although the electron pairing mechanism for unconventional superconductors is not known, the pairing mechanism for BCS superconductors is well understood by the Eliashberg function and the McMillan equation. Nevertheless, the first-principles calculations needed are exceedingly expensive. For this reason, a rapid screening of candidate BCS superconductors and their Tc using first-principles calculations is prohibitive. We leverage machine learning to eliminate the need for first-principles calculations when predicting whether or not a material is a BCS superconductor. A database of experimentally relevant crystal structure data is carefully curated and materials descriptors suitable for describing the experimental data are chosen. Machine learning models are trained to classify if a material is a BCS superconductor. This framework provides a roadmap for accelerating the discovery of novel BCS superconductors without BCS theory.

ACS Omega
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US), NTT Basic Research Laboratories (JP), Astronomy and Space (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine Learning Prediction of BCS Superconductors without BCS Theory — Yoshiharu Krockenberger, Dylan Sheils, et al. · ACS Omega (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS