Experimental Characterization and a Machine Learning Framework for FDM-Fabricated Biocomposite Lattice Structures

The present study investigates simple cubic lattice structures fabricated through an FDM-based three-dimensional (3D) printing method using wood–polylactic acid (wood–PLA) bio-composite filament and develops a data-driven framework to predict their mechanical response. The design of experiments (DOE) was developed using a response surface methodology (RSM) based on a central composite design (CCD) that was implemented in Design-Expert software (Version 13). During fabrication, four different manufacturing parameters—the layer height, the printing speed, the nozzle temperature, and the infill density—were considered. The compressive strength and compressive modulus were evaluated experimentally, and the corresponding stress–strain responses were examined. The results reveal that the layer height is the most influential parameter, where lower layer heights (0.06–0.1 mm) significantly improve both the compressive strength and the modulus due to enhanced interlayer bonding and reduced void formation. The printing speed and the nozzle temperature also play critical roles, where lower printing speeds (≈40 mm/s) and moderate nozzle temperatures (≈195–205 °C) promote more uniform material deposition and improved interlayer bonding, while higher speeds (≥60 mm/s) and excessive temperatures (≈225 °C) lead to reduced bonding quality and a deterioration in mechanical performance. In contrast, the infill density exhibited a non-monotonic influence, where intermediate levels (around 70%) provided an improved performance under combinations of the low layer height (≈0.1 mm), the low printing speed (≈40 mm/s), and the moderate nozzle temperature (≈195–215 °C), suggesting an interaction-driven effect rather than a purely density-dependent trend. To complement the experimental findings, a machine learning model based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was developed using 12,000 data points that were derived from stress–strain curves. The model successfully predicted continuous mechanical responses with errors in the range of 2–8% for unseen specimens, suggesting its capability to capture the relationship between printing parameters and mechanical behavior within the studied design space. Overall, the study highlights that the mechanical properties of wood–PLA lattice structures can be effectively tailored by choosing an appropriate printing parameter control and demonstrates the feasibility of using machine learning to estimate mechanical performance without additional physical testing within the defined parameter domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fibers
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fib14040041
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Characterization and a Machine Learning Framework for FDM-Fabricated Biocomposite Lattice Structures

Saiaf Bin Rayhan, Szabolcs Szávai, Md Mazedur Rahman, Md Ahad Israq et al.
Fibers
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Experimental Characterization and a Machine Learning Framework for FDM-Fabricated Biocomposite Lattice Structures

Saiaf Bin Rayhan, Szabolcs Szávai, Md Mazedur Rahman, Md Ahad Israq, Gyula Varga
article en

Abstract

The present study investigates simple cubic lattice structures fabricated through an FDM-based three-dimensional (3D) printing method using wood–polylactic acid (wood–PLA) bio-composite filament and develops a data-driven framework to predict their mechanical response. The design of experiments (DOE) was developed using a response surface methodology (RSM) based on a central composite design (CCD) that was implemented in Design-Expert software (Version 13). During fabrication, four different manufacturing parameters—the layer height, the printing speed, the nozzle temperature, and the infill density—were considered. The compressive strength and compressive modulus were evaluated experimentally, and the corresponding stress–strain responses were examined. The results reveal that the layer height is the most influential parameter, where lower layer heights (0.06–0.1 mm) significantly improve both the compressive strength and the modulus due to enhanced interlayer bonding and reduced void formation. The printing speed and the nozzle temperature also play critical roles, where lower printing speeds (≈40 mm/s) and moderate nozzle temperatures (≈195–205 °C) promote more uniform material deposition and improved interlayer bonding, while higher speeds (≥60 mm/s) and excessive temperatures (≈225 °C) lead to reduced bonding quality and a deterioration in mechanical performance. In contrast, the infill density exhibited a non-monotonic influence, where intermediate levels (around 70%) provided an improved performance under combinations of the low layer height (≈0.1 mm), the low printing speed (≈40 mm/s), and the moderate nozzle temperature (≈195–215 °C), suggesting an interaction-driven effect rather than a purely density-dependent trend. To complement the experimental findings, a machine learning model based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was developed using 12,000 data points that were derived from stress–strain curves. The model successfully predicted continuous mechanical responses with errors in the range of 2–8% for unseen specimens, suggesting its capability to capture the relationship between printing parameters and mechanical behavior within the studied design space. Overall, the study highlights that the mechanical properties of wood–PLA lattice structures can be effectively tailored by choosing an appropriate printing parameter control and demonstrates the feasibility of using machine learning to estimate mechanical performance without additional physical testing within the defined parameter domain.

FibersVol. 14(4)
University of Miskolc (HU), Civil Aviation University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.