SRS215 - Calculating and reducing the environmental impact of hybrid endovascular surgery

Abstract The healthcare sector is a substantial contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, with surgical services accounting for a significant proportion due to the use of single-use consumables, volatile anaesthetic agents, and energy-intensive infrastructure, including ventilation, lighting & climate control systems. This study quantified the carbon footprint of commonly performed arterial vascular procedures and identified modifiable drivers to reduce their environmental impact. A prospective observational study was carried out at a single vascular surgery centre, focusing on four procedure types: simple endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), complex EVAR, percutaneous lower limb revascularisation, and hybrid lower limb revascularisation. Real-time data were collected to capture devices, consumables, and waste associated with each intervention. A life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach quantified emissions across the product pathway, including raw material extraction, manufacturing, packaging, transportation, and disposal. Carbon emissions varied significantly between procedure types (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 11.53, P < 0.05), with complex EVAR associated with the highest median emissions, reflecting greater resource intensity and procedural complexity. Median emissions for complex EVAR were equivalent to driving approximately 418 miles in a standard petrol vehicle. A strong positive correlation was seen between the number of theatre personnel and the volume of single-use wearable items (Spearman’s ρ = 0.878, P < 0.001), suggesting staffing levels contribute meaningfully to procedural waste. Opportunities to reduce emissions were identified, including use of percutaneous techniques, reusable surgical textiles, sustainable packaging strategies and imaging optimisation. This pilot study represents the first observational quantification of the carbon footprint associated with common arterial vascular procedures and identifies targets for sustainability interventions within vascular surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.201
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS215 - Calculating and reducing the environmental impact of hybrid endovascular surgery

Tom Dawson, Becky Sandford, A. G. Patel, Andy Garnham et al.
British journal of surgery
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

SRS215 - Calculating and reducing the environmental impact of hybrid endovascular surgery

Tom Dawson, Becky Sandford, A. G. Patel, Andy Garnham, Adriano Motta, Yash Sharma
article en

Abstract

Abstract The healthcare sector is a substantial contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions, with surgical services accounting for a significant proportion due to the use of single-use consumables, volatile anaesthetic agents, and energy-intensive infrastructure, including ventilation, lighting & climate control systems. This study quantified the carbon footprint of commonly performed arterial vascular procedures and identified modifiable drivers to reduce their environmental impact. A prospective observational study was carried out at a single vascular surgery centre, focusing on four procedure types: simple endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), complex EVAR, percutaneous lower limb revascularisation, and hybrid lower limb revascularisation. Real-time data were collected to capture devices, consumables, and waste associated with each intervention. A life-cycle assessment (LCA) approach quantified emissions across the product pathway, including raw material extraction, manufacturing, packaging, transportation, and disposal. Carbon emissions varied significantly between procedure types (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 11.53, P < 0.05), with complex EVAR associated with the highest median emissions, reflecting greater resource intensity and procedural complexity. Median emissions for complex EVAR were equivalent to driving approximately 418 miles in a standard petrol vehicle. A strong positive correlation was seen between the number of theatre personnel and the volume of single-use wearable items (Spearman’s ρ = 0.878, P < 0.001), suggesting staffing levels contribute meaningfully to procedural waste. Opportunities to reduce emissions were identified, including use of percutaneous techniques, reusable surgical textiles, sustainable packaging strategies and imaging optimisation. This pilot study represents the first observational quantification of the carbon footprint associated with common arterial vascular procedures and identifies targets for sustainability interventions within vascular surgery.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Thomas Foundation (AU), St. Thomas Hospital (CA), West Midlands Deanery (GB), The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.