Mass Spectrometry Proteomics of the Nanoparticle Corona Is Highly Dependent on Sample Preparation Protocol

It is widely established that the layers of proteins bound to the surface of nanoparticles (NPs), also known as the protein corona, critically influence their behavior in biological environments. Despite numerous proteomics studies performed in different NP-corona systems, the impact of proteomic sample preparation methods on corona profiling remains poorly understood. In this study, we systematically compared five digestion protocols, namely S-Trap<sup>TM</sup>, iST<sup>TM</sup>, ProteaseMAX<sup>TM</sup>, RapiGest<sup>TM</sup>, and a routine in-gel digestion protocol commonly used in several laboratories. Protein corona samples were isolated from silica NPs incubated in 80% human plasma in phosphate-buffered saline. Protocol performance was assessed in terms of digestion efficiency, protein and peptide yield, reproducibility, and identification bias. Proteomic characterization revealed marked differences across protocols, highlighting the influence of protocol on protein digestion, recovery, and representation. Our findings emphasize the need for method standardization and tailored protocol selection in corona studies to ensure accurate and reproducible proteomic profiling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PROTEOMICS
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.70118
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mass Spectrometry Proteomics of the Nanoparticle Corona Is Highly Dependent on Sample Preparation Protocol

Asia Saorin, Paula Meleady, Marco P. Monopoli, Michael Henry et al.
PROTEOMICS
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
article

Mass Spectrometry Proteomics of the Nanoparticle Corona Is Highly Dependent on Sample Preparation Protocol

Asia Saorin, Paula Meleady, Marco P. Monopoli, Michael Henry, Alberto Martinez‐Serra
article en

Abstract

It is widely established that the layers of proteins bound to the surface of nanoparticles (NPs), also known as the protein corona, critically influence their behavior in biological environments. Despite numerous proteomics studies performed in different NP-corona systems, the impact of proteomic sample preparation methods on corona profiling remains poorly understood. In this study, we systematically compared five digestion protocols, namely S-Trap<sup>TM</sup>, iST<sup>TM</sup>, ProteaseMAX<sup>TM</sup>, RapiGest<sup>TM</sup>, and a routine in-gel digestion protocol commonly used in several laboratories. Protein corona samples were isolated from silica NPs incubated in 80% human plasma in phosphate-buffered saline. Protocol performance was assessed in terms of digestion efficiency, protein and peptide yield, reproducibility, and identification bias. Proteomic characterization revealed marked differences across protocols, highlighting the influence of protocol on protein digestion, recovery, and representation. Our findings emphasize the need for method standardization and tailored protocol selection in corona studies to ensure accurate and reproducible proteomic profiling.

PROTEOMICS
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.