Detecting Regimes of Critical Zone Processes, Drivers and Predictability With a Data‐Driven Framework

Abstract In highly productive agricultural landscapes, human impacts combine with naturally variable climate conditions and geologic legacies to fundamentally alter critical zone (CZ) processes. For example, artificial drainage and fertilizer applications impact riverine transport of water and nutrients, and abrupt transitions in vegetation states impact land‐atmosphere fluxes of water and energy. Subsystem components may switch from being nearly independent to tightly synchronized, and drivers may elicit non‐linear or threshold responses. These shifts have implications for predictive understanding, but are challenging to identify and quantify. We present a flexible, data‐driven framework that identifies temporal regimes in CZ behavior, associated with particular environmental drivers and modes of variability. We integrate unsupervised clustering, dimensionality reduction, and information‐theoretic metrics to isolate temporal regimes and assess changes in drivers and predictability across several case studies. Specifically, we analyze high‐frequency time‐series data sets of root‐soil gases, land‐atmosphere fluxes, and river chemistry in intensively managed and more natural CZ study sites. Clusters and variability in these multivariate systems relate to rapid seasonal transitions in agricultural relative to prairie sites, and impacts of fertilizer timing on solute responses to events. Environmental drivers have variable explanatory power over system states that align with growing season, flows, or management. This study objectively detects dynamic transitions in CZ systems, and is more broadly applicable to any Earth system time‐series data or model evaluation to detect behavioral regimes and shifts in predictability of complex systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AGU Advances
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025av002098
Primary Topic
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Regimes of Critical Zone Processes, Drivers and Predictability With a Data‐Driven Framework

Allison E. Goodwell, L. R. Welp, Steve Sargent, Erin Bauer et al.
AGU Advances
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
article

Detecting Regimes of Critical Zone Processes, Drivers and Predictability With a Data‐Driven Framework

Allison E. Goodwell, L. R. Welp, Steve Sargent, Erin Bauer, Brian Saccardi, Ashlee Dere, Andrew J. Stumpf, Jennifer L. Druhan, Jinyu Wang, Praveen Kumar
article en

Abstract

Abstract In highly productive agricultural landscapes, human impacts combine with naturally variable climate conditions and geologic legacies to fundamentally alter critical zone (CZ) processes. For example, artificial drainage and fertilizer applications impact riverine transport of water and nutrients, and abrupt transitions in vegetation states impact land‐atmosphere fluxes of water and energy. Subsystem components may switch from being nearly independent to tightly synchronized, and drivers may elicit non‐linear or threshold responses. These shifts have implications for predictive understanding, but are challenging to identify and quantify. We present a flexible, data‐driven framework that identifies temporal regimes in CZ behavior, associated with particular environmental drivers and modes of variability. We integrate unsupervised clustering, dimensionality reduction, and information‐theoretic metrics to isolate temporal regimes and assess changes in drivers and predictability across several case studies. Specifically, we analyze high‐frequency time‐series data sets of root‐soil gases, land‐atmosphere fluxes, and river chemistry in intensively managed and more natural CZ study sites. Clusters and variability in these multivariate systems relate to rapid seasonal transitions in agricultural relative to prairie sites, and impacts of fertilizer timing on solute responses to events. Environmental drivers have variable explanatory power over system states that align with growing season, flows, or management. This study objectively detects dynamic transitions in CZ systems, and is more broadly applicable to any Earth system time‐series data or model evaluation to detect behavioral regimes and shifts in predictability of complex systems.

AGU AdvancesVol. 7(2)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.