Comparative efficacy of different training modes on physical fitness in soccer (football) players: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials

Investigating the effects of different training modes on the physical fitness of soccer players. A comprehensive and systematic search was performed to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a cutoff date of November 2025. A random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed within a frequency-based framework. A total of 52 studies involving 1,320 participants were included. Regarding aerobic capacity, SUCRA rankings indicated that High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) had the highest probability of being the most effective intervention for improving VO₂max levels (SUCRA = 74.3; SMD = 0.53, 95% CI [0.15, 0.91], p = 0.007). Regarding anaerobic capacity, HIIT ranked first for improving 20-m sprint test performance (SUCRA = 90.6; SMD = -0.51, 95% CI [-0.80, -0.22], p = 0.001), Change of direction (COD) (SUCRA = 81.2; SMD = -0.83, 95% CI [-1.22, -0.43], p < 0.001), and Repeated sprint ability (RSA) (SUCRA = 73.2; SMD = -0.94, 95% CI [-1.86, -0.03], p = 0.043). Low-intensity continuous training (LICT) presented the highest probability of effectiveness for the 30-m sprint test (SUCRA = 99.3; SMD = -1.26, 95% CI [-2.03, -0.50], p = 0.001) and Countermovement jump (CMJ) (SUCRA = 90.9; SMD = 0.96, 95% CI [0.16, 1.76], p = 0.019). Small-sided games (SSG) also yielded significant improvements in CMJ (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI [0.03, 0.77], p = 0.033) and COD (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI [-0.94, -0.09], p = 0.018). Notably, the HIIT + SSG group (HSG) was associated with a decrease in 20-m sprint test performance (SMD = 1.84, 95% CI [0.69, 2.99], p = 0.002). No training modality showed significant effects on 10-m sprint test performance. For soccer-specific endurance (SSE), HIIT emerged as the intervention with the highest probability of effectiveness for improving Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) performance (SUCRA = 86.2; SMD = 0.78, 95% CI [0.33, 1.22], p = 0.001). Current evidence indicates that HIIT presents the highest probability of effectiveness for enhancing soccer players’ aerobic capacity and soccer-specific endurance (SSE). Furthermore, HIIT was associated with significant improvements across most indicators of anaerobic capacity. From a practical perspective, these findings suggest the potential value of integrating diverse training modalities in a personalized manner, tailored to specific objectives, to optimize physical fitness outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01668-y
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of different training modes on physical fitness in soccer (football) players: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials

Shanshan Li, Liang Tan, Weihua Yan
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparative efficacy of different training modes on physical fitness in soccer (football) players: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials

Shanshan Li, Liang Tan, Weihua Yan
article en

Abstract

Investigating the effects of different training modes on the physical fitness of soccer players. A comprehensive and systematic search was performed to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a cutoff date of November 2025. A random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed within a frequency-based framework. A total of 52 studies involving 1,320 participants were included. Regarding aerobic capacity, SUCRA rankings indicated that High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) had the highest probability of being the most effective intervention for improving VO₂max levels (SUCRA = 74.3; SMD = 0.53, 95% CI [0.15, 0.91], p = 0.007). Regarding anaerobic capacity, HIIT ranked first for improving 20-m sprint test performance (SUCRA = 90.6; SMD = -0.51, 95% CI [-0.80, -0.22], p = 0.001), Change of direction (COD) (SUCRA = 81.2; SMD = -0.83, 95% CI [-1.22, -0.43], p < 0.001), and Repeated sprint ability (RSA) (SUCRA = 73.2; SMD = -0.94, 95% CI [-1.86, -0.03], p = 0.043). Low-intensity continuous training (LICT) presented the highest probability of effectiveness for the 30-m sprint test (SUCRA = 99.3; SMD = -1.26, 95% CI [-2.03, -0.50], p = 0.001) and Countermovement jump (CMJ) (SUCRA = 90.9; SMD = 0.96, 95% CI [0.16, 1.76], p = 0.019). Small-sided games (SSG) also yielded significant improvements in CMJ (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI [0.03, 0.77], p = 0.033) and COD (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI [-0.94, -0.09], p = 0.018). Notably, the HIIT + SSG group (HSG) was associated with a decrease in 20-m sprint test performance (SMD = 1.84, 95% CI [0.69, 2.99], p = 0.002). No training modality showed significant effects on 10-m sprint test performance. For soccer-specific endurance (SSE), HIIT emerged as the intervention with the highest probability of effectiveness for improving Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1 (Yo-Yo IR1) performance (SUCRA = 86.2; SMD = 0.78, 95% CI [0.33, 1.22], p = 0.001). Current evidence indicates that HIIT presents the highest probability of effectiveness for enhancing soccer players’ aerobic capacity and soccer-specific endurance (SSE). Furthermore, HIIT was associated with significant improvements across most indicators of anaerobic capacity. From a practical perspective, these findings suggest the potential value of integrating diverse training modalities in a personalized manner, tailored to specific objectives, to optimize physical fitness outcomes.

BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Zhengzhou University (CN), Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL), Beijing Sport University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.