Beyond linearity: reimagining AI as a participant in circular bioeconomies

As artificial intelligence transitions from industry-exclusive tool to public-facing technology, society faces critical decisions about its integration into socioecological systems. This paper proposes a reimagining of AI as a synthetic participant in the circular bioeconomy (CBE)-a regenerative model emphasizing cyclical flows of resources, information, and energy. Drawing on Bruno Latour's Actor-Network Theory and Donna Haraway's posthumanism, we reconceptualize AI as a non-living organism capable of functioning within multispecies systems, analogous to viruses that shape ecosystems without conventional life. Conventional, in that it meets the standard biological criteria for like: metabolism, reproduction, and homeostasis. AI, like viruses, does not meet this biological criteria. Current AI applications in CBE-from biowaste recycling to precision agriculture-demonstrate both transformative potential and ethical concerns. While AI enables unprecedented efficiency through advanced algorithms and embodied robotics, it risks perpetuating extractive logics that treat information as a resource to be mined rather than circulated. Critical ethical challenges emerge including algorithmic bias amplifying inequalities, epistemic opacity eroding stakeholder trust, blurred accountability for AI-driven harm, displacement of human labor, and marginalization of indigenous and local ecological knowledge. Through examples in medicine and remote sensing, we argue that AI becomes a "friend" to the Circular Bioeconomy (CBE) only when designed as circular and relational rather than linear and extractive. This requires synthetic datasets preserving privacy, multimodal architectures enabling dimensional understanding, and human-machine-ecosystem feedback loops replacing terminal outputs with ongoing accountability. Ultimately, AI's role depends on intentional design grounded in justice and multispecies dignity-transforming it from extractive tool into participant in shared regenerative futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biological Engineering
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-026-00672-7
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond linearity: reimagining AI as a participant in circular bioeconomies

L. Yang, Barira Rashid, Aarthi Muthukumar
Journal of Biological Engineering
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

Beyond linearity: reimagining AI as a participant in circular bioeconomies

L. Yang, Barira Rashid, Aarthi Muthukumar
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence transitions from industry-exclusive tool to public-facing technology, society faces critical decisions about its integration into socioecological systems. This paper proposes a reimagining of AI as a synthetic participant in the circular bioeconomy (CBE)-a regenerative model emphasizing cyclical flows of resources, information, and energy. Drawing on Bruno Latour's Actor-Network Theory and Donna Haraway's posthumanism, we reconceptualize AI as a non-living organism capable of functioning within multispecies systems, analogous to viruses that shape ecosystems without conventional life. Conventional, in that it meets the standard biological criteria for like: metabolism, reproduction, and homeostasis. AI, like viruses, does not meet this biological criteria. Current AI applications in CBE-from biowaste recycling to precision agriculture-demonstrate both transformative potential and ethical concerns. While AI enables unprecedented efficiency through advanced algorithms and embodied robotics, it risks perpetuating extractive logics that treat information as a resource to be mined rather than circulated. Critical ethical challenges emerge including algorithmic bias amplifying inequalities, epistemic opacity eroding stakeholder trust, blurred accountability for AI-driven harm, displacement of human labor, and marginalization of indigenous and local ecological knowledge. Through examples in medicine and remote sensing, we argue that AI becomes a "friend" to the Circular Bioeconomy (CBE) only when designed as circular and relational rather than linear and extractive. This requires synthetic datasets preserving privacy, multimodal architectures enabling dimensional understanding, and human-machine-ecosystem feedback loops replacing terminal outputs with ongoing accountability. Ultimately, AI's role depends on intentional design grounded in justice and multispecies dignity-transforming it from extractive tool into participant in shared regenerative futures.

Journal of Biological EngineeringVol. 20(1)
Rocky Vista University (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.