Intent-driven LLM ensemble planning for flexible multi-robot manipulation

Introduction In this study, we address intent-driven task planning for complex multi-action manipulation sequences in heterogeneous multi-robot cells. Given a perception back-end that outputs a structured object-level scene description and a human operator’s natural-language intent, we generate a precedence-consistent object-level robot-action sequence, which can then be executed by passing each such action to a lower-level motion planning module. Methods The pipeline integrates i. perception-to-text scene encoding, ii. an ensemble of large language models (LLMs) that generate candidate action sequences based on the operator’s intent, iii. an LLM-based verifier that enforces formatting and precedence constraints, and iv. a deterministic consistency filter that rejects hallucinated objects. The pipeline is evaluated on an example task in which two robot arms work collaboratively to dismantle an electric-vehicle (EV) battery for recycling applications. A variety of components must be grasped and removed in specific sequences, determined either by human instructions or by task-order feasibility decisions made by the autonomous system. Results On 200 real scenes with 600 operator prompts across five component classes, we used metrics of full-sequence correctness and next-task correctness to evaluate and compare five LLM-based planners (including ablation analyses of pipeline components). We also evaluated the LLM-based human interface in terms of time to execution and NASA TLX using human participant experiments. On 200 real scenes and 600 prompts, full-sequence correctness improves from 0.761 (single LLM) to 0.824 (6-LLM + verifier + deterministic filter), and next-object correctness improves from 0.866 to 0.894. Discussion Results in our case study indicate that our ensemble-with-verification approach reliably maps operator intent to safe multi-robot plans while maintaining low user effort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2026.1727433
Primary Topic
Robot Manipulation and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intent-driven LLM ensemble planning for flexible multi-robot manipulation

Rustam Stolkin, Cansu Erdoğan, Alireza Rastegarpanah, Cesar Alan Contreras et al.
Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Robot Manipulation and Learning
article

Intent-driven LLM ensemble planning for flexible multi-robot manipulation

Rustam Stolkin, Cansu Erdoğan, Alireza Rastegarpanah, Cesar Alan Contreras, Manolis Chiou
article en

Abstract

Introduction In this study, we address intent-driven task planning for complex multi-action manipulation sequences in heterogeneous multi-robot cells. Given a perception back-end that outputs a structured object-level scene description and a human operator’s natural-language intent, we generate a precedence-consistent object-level robot-action sequence, which can then be executed by passing each such action to a lower-level motion planning module. Methods The pipeline integrates i. perception-to-text scene encoding, ii. an ensemble of large language models (LLMs) that generate candidate action sequences based on the operator’s intent, iii. an LLM-based verifier that enforces formatting and precedence constraints, and iv. a deterministic consistency filter that rejects hallucinated objects. The pipeline is evaluated on an example task in which two robot arms work collaboratively to dismantle an electric-vehicle (EV) battery for recycling applications. A variety of components must be grasped and removed in specific sequences, determined either by human instructions or by task-order feasibility decisions made by the autonomous system. Results On 200 real scenes with 600 operator prompts across five component classes, we used metrics of full-sequence correctness and next-task correctness to evaluate and compare five LLM-based planners (including ablation analyses of pipeline components). We also evaluated the LLM-based human interface in terms of time to execution and NASA TLX using human participant experiments. On 200 real scenes and 600 prompts, full-sequence correctness improves from 0.761 (single LLM) to 0.824 (6-LLM + verifier + deterministic filter), and next-object correctness improves from 0.866 to 0.894. Discussion Results in our case study indicate that our ensemble-with-verification approach reliably maps operator intent to safe multi-robot plans while maintaining low user effort.

Frontiers in Robotics and AIVol. 13
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Robotics Research (United States) (US), Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Robot Manipulation and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.