Quadratic and Cubic Scrambling in the Estimation of Two Successive Phase‐Shifts

ABSTRACT Multiparameter quantum estimation becomes challenging when the parameters are incompatible, i.e., when their respective symmetric logarithmic derivatives do not commute, or when the model is sloppy, meaning that the quantum probe depends only on combinations of parameters leading to a degenerate or ill‐conditioned Fisher information matrix. In this work, we explore the use of scrambling operations between parameter encoding to overcome sloppiness. We consider a bosonic model with two phase‐shift parameters and analyze the performance of second‐ and third‐order nonlinear scrambling using two classes of probe states: squeezed vacuum states and coherent states. Our results demonstrate that nonlinear scrambling mitigates sloppiness, increases compatibility, and improves overall estimation precision. We find third‐order nonlinearity to be more effective than second‐order under both fixed‐probe and fixed‐energy constraints. Furthermore, by comparing joint estimation to a stepwise estimation strategy, we show that a threshold for nonlinear coupling exists. For coherent probes, joint estimation outperforms the stepwise strategy if the nonlinearity is sufficiently large, while for squeezed probes, this advantage is observed specifically with third‐order nonlinearity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202501012
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quadratic and Cubic Scrambling in the Estimation of Two Successive Phase‐Shifts

Manju, Matteo G. A. Paris, Stefano Olivares
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Quantum Information and Cryptography
article

Quadratic and Cubic Scrambling in the Estimation of Two Successive Phase‐Shifts

Manju, Matteo G. A. Paris, Stefano Olivares
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Multiparameter quantum estimation becomes challenging when the parameters are incompatible, i.e., when their respective symmetric logarithmic derivatives do not commute, or when the model is sloppy, meaning that the quantum probe depends only on combinations of parameters leading to a degenerate or ill‐conditioned Fisher information matrix. In this work, we explore the use of scrambling operations between parameter encoding to overcome sloppiness. We consider a bosonic model with two phase‐shift parameters and analyze the performance of second‐ and third‐order nonlinear scrambling using two classes of probe states: squeezed vacuum states and coherent states. Our results demonstrate that nonlinear scrambling mitigates sloppiness, increases compatibility, and improves overall estimation precision. We find third‐order nonlinearity to be more effective than second‐order under both fixed‐probe and fixed‐energy constraints. Furthermore, by comparing joint estimation to a stepwise estimation strategy, we show that a threshold for nonlinear coupling exists. For coherent probes, joint estimation outperforms the stepwise strategy if the nonlinearity is sufficiently large, while for squeezed probes, this advantage is observed specifically with third‐order nonlinearity.

Advanced Quantum TechnologiesVol. 9(3)
University of Milan (IT)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quadratic and Cubic Scrambling in the Estimation of Two Successive Phase‐Shifts — Manju, Matteo G. A. Paris, et al. · Advanced Quantum Technologies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS