Reflections on the scope of totally grounded analogies
Abstract Totally or fully grounded analogical arguments are such that the truth of their premises guarantees the truth of their conclusions. This is not so with partially grounded analogies. This paper examines the scope of totally grounded analogies and argues that partially grounded analogies are likely to be more common than totally grounded analogies. It also explores why this is so.
Authors
- Marcello Guarini
Institutions
- University of Windsor (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Logic Journal of IGPL
- Published
- 2025-12-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzaf096
- Primary Topic
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00