Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Functional Vision Scale for Adults

Objective: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate the Functional Vision Scale for Adults (FVSA), an occupation-centred patient-reported outcome measure on daily functioning across key occupational performance domains. Methods: The scale development process followed incorporating a comprehensive literature review and expert consultations (n = 10) to establish content validity. An initial item pool of 51 items was refined through expert review and pilot testing (n = 55), resulting in a 33-item scale. The final version was administered to 526 adults (372 without visual problems, 154 with visual problems). Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Known-group validity was assessed by comparing scores between participants with and without visual problems. Reliability was tested through internal consistency (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω) and test–retest reliability (ICC) in a subsample (n = 62). Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure corresponding to education, activities of daily living (ADLs), social participation and instrumental ADLs (IADLs). Known-group validity was confirmed with statistically significant differences across all subscales (p < 0.05). The FVSA Total Score demonstrated excellent reliability, as evidenced by a strong ICC value (ICC = 0.835, p < 0.001) supported by high internal consistency coefficients (ω = 0.946; α = 0.933). Conclusions: The FVSA is a reliable and valid instrument that provides a comprehensive, occupation-centred assessment of functional vision in adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14070852
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Functional Vision Scale for Adults

Esra Akı, Keziban Temuçin
Healthcare
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Functional Vision Scale for Adults

Esra Akı, Keziban Temuçin
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate the Functional Vision Scale for Adults (FVSA), an occupation-centred patient-reported outcome measure on daily functioning across key occupational performance domains. Methods: The scale development process followed incorporating a comprehensive literature review and expert consultations (n = 10) to establish content validity. An initial item pool of 51 items was refined through expert review and pilot testing (n = 55), resulting in a 33-item scale. The final version was administered to 526 adults (372 without visual problems, 154 with visual problems). Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Known-group validity was assessed by comparing scores between participants with and without visual problems. Reliability was tested through internal consistency (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω) and test–retest reliability (ICC) in a subsample (n = 62). Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-factor structure corresponding to education, activities of daily living (ADLs), social participation and instrumental ADLs (IADLs). Known-group validity was confirmed with statistically significant differences across all subscales (p < 0.05). The FVSA Total Score demonstrated excellent reliability, as evidenced by a strong ICC value (ICC = 0.835, p < 0.001) supported by high internal consistency coefficients (ω = 0.946; α = 0.933). Conclusions: The FVSA is a reliable and valid instrument that provides a comprehensive, occupation-centred assessment of functional vision in adults.

HealthcareVol. 14(7)
Hacettepe University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.