IPA for stationary problems

In this paper, we develop a unified theory of IPA estimators for steady-state performance characteristics. Our goal is to clarify how infinitesimal perturbation analysis can be systematically connected to a measure-valued differentiation framework for the underlying Markov chain dynamics. Traditionally, the asymptotic behavior of gradient estimators has been studied by analyzing the estimators themselves. Here, we take a different perspective. We show that by clearly separating the level at which arguments are made, either at the sample-path level, where IPA is usually formulated, or at the operator/measure level, where Markov chain differentiation is naturally expressed, one can combine the strengths of both approaches. Our framework helps bridge two established streams of research and contributes a more general understanding of IPA for steady-state problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discrete Event Dynamic Systems
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10626-026-00438-9
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IPA for stationary problems

Bernd Heidergott
Discrete Event Dynamic Systems
Control Systems and Identification
article

IPA for stationary problems

Bernd Heidergott
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a unified theory of IPA estimators for steady-state performance characteristics. Our goal is to clarify how infinitesimal perturbation analysis can be systematically connected to a measure-valued differentiation framework for the underlying Markov chain dynamics. Traditionally, the asymptotic behavior of gradient estimators has been studied by analyzing the estimators themselves. Here, we take a different perspective. We show that by clearly separating the level at which arguments are made, either at the sample-path level, where IPA is usually formulated, or at the operator/measure level, where Markov chain differentiation is naturally expressed, one can combine the strengths of both approaches. Our framework helps bridge two established streams of research and contributes a more general understanding of IPA for steady-state problems.

Discrete Event Dynamic SystemsVol. 36(1)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Control Systems and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.