Identification and Prioritization of Neoantigens Derived from Non-Synonymous Mutations in Melanoma Through HLA Class I Binding Prediction

Melanoma is characterized by a high mutational burden making it an established model for studying tumor neoantigens and developing strategies for personalized immunotherapy. In this study, a reproducible bioinformatics pipeline was developed and implemented for the identification and prioritization of candidate neoantigens derived from non-synonymous somatic mutations in melanoma, using genomic data from the MSK-IMPACT cohort (mel-mskimpact-2020; n = 696) and comparative reference information from TCGA-SKCM. From the somatic mutation annotation file (MAF), 16,311 non-synonymous mutations were filtered, from which 50,480 mutant 8–11-mer peptides were generated using a sliding-window approach centered on the mutated position. Peptide–HLA class I binding affinity was predicted using MHCflurry 2.0 across six representative alleles (HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*24:02, HLA-B*35:01, HLA-B*39:05, HLA-C*04:01, and HLA-C*07:02). Candidate prioritization was initially based on predicted binding percentile (rank ≤ 2), identifying 12,209 peptide–HLA combinations with high predicted binding affinity. To refine candidate selection, additional computational analyses were incorporated, including proteasomal cleavage prediction using NetChop 3.1 and estimation of T-cell epitope immunogenicity using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) immunogenicity predictor. Furthermore, a direct comparison between mutant (MUT) and corresponding wild-type (WT) peptides was performed using Δaffinity and Δrank metrics to evaluate the predicted impact of somatic mutations on HLA binding. The analysis revealed a predominance of peptides associated with the HLA-B locus, particularly the allele HLA-B*35:01, among the interactions with the lowest predicted binding percentiles. Several high-ranking peptide candidates were derived from genes with known roles in melanoma biology, including PLCG2, GATA3, AKT1, PTEN, PTCH1, and SMO. Overall, the integrative computational framework implemented in this study enables the systematic prioritization of candidate neoantigens derived from non-synonymous mutations in melanoma. This pipeline provides a reproducible strategy for exploring tumor neoantigen repertoires and may serve as a foundation for subsequent experimental validation and for studies related to neoantigen-based immunotherapies and immunopeptidomics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Immuno
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno6020021
Primary Topic
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification and Prioritization of Neoantigens Derived from Non-Synonymous Mutations in Melanoma Through HLA Class I Binding Prediction

Karen E. Villagrana-Bañuelos, Manuel A. Soto-Murillo, Gloria Viviana Cerrillo-Rojas, Valeria Maeda-Gutiérrez et al.
Immuno
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
article

Identification and Prioritization of Neoantigens Derived from Non-Synonymous Mutations in Melanoma Through HLA Class I Binding Prediction

Karen E. Villagrana-Bañuelos, Manuel A. Soto-Murillo, Gloria Viviana Cerrillo-Rojas, Valeria Maeda-Gutiérrez, Karina Trejo-Vázquez, Carlos E. Galván-Tejada, Carlos H. Espino-Salinas, Jorge I. Galván-Tejada, Hans C. Correa-Aguado
article en

Abstract

Melanoma is characterized by a high mutational burden making it an established model for studying tumor neoantigens and developing strategies for personalized immunotherapy. In this study, a reproducible bioinformatics pipeline was developed and implemented for the identification and prioritization of candidate neoantigens derived from non-synonymous somatic mutations in melanoma, using genomic data from the MSK-IMPACT cohort (mel-mskimpact-2020; n = 696) and comparative reference information from TCGA-SKCM. From the somatic mutation annotation file (MAF), 16,311 non-synonymous mutations were filtered, from which 50,480 mutant 8–11-mer peptides were generated using a sliding-window approach centered on the mutated position. Peptide–HLA class I binding affinity was predicted using MHCflurry 2.0 across six representative alleles (HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*24:02, HLA-B*35:01, HLA-B*39:05, HLA-C*04:01, and HLA-C*07:02). Candidate prioritization was initially based on predicted binding percentile (rank ≤ 2), identifying 12,209 peptide–HLA combinations with high predicted binding affinity. To refine candidate selection, additional computational analyses were incorporated, including proteasomal cleavage prediction using NetChop 3.1 and estimation of T-cell epitope immunogenicity using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) immunogenicity predictor. Furthermore, a direct comparison between mutant (MUT) and corresponding wild-type (WT) peptides was performed using Δaffinity and Δrank metrics to evaluate the predicted impact of somatic mutations on HLA binding. The analysis revealed a predominance of peptides associated with the HLA-B locus, particularly the allele HLA-B*35:01, among the interactions with the lowest predicted binding percentiles. Several high-ranking peptide candidates were derived from genes with known roles in melanoma biology, including PLCG2, GATA3, AKT1, PTEN, PTCH1, and SMO. Overall, the integrative computational framework implemented in this study enables the systematic prioritization of candidate neoantigens derived from non-synonymous mutations in melanoma. This pipeline provides a reproducible strategy for exploring tumor neoantigen repertoires and may serve as a foundation for subsequent experimental validation and for studies related to neoantigen-based immunotherapies and immunopeptidomics.

ImmunoVol. 6(2)
Universidad Politécnica de Zacatecas (MX), Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas "Francisco García Salinas" (MX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.