Mu-Rhythm Phase Modulates Cortical Reactivity to Subthreshold TMS: A TMS–EEG Study

Background: The phase of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals critically influences cortical reactivity to external inputs. Phase-dependent effects and their sensitivity to stimulation intensity have been observed at suprathreshold levels, while subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) cannot induce motor evoked potentials (MEPs), resulting in limited research on phase-dependent responses under subthreshold stimulation. In this study, we used a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS–EEG) approach to examine how the ongoing EEG phase influences cortical responses at subthreshold intensity and to characterize these responses in terms of temporal, spatial, and spectral features. Methods: Thirty-four healthy adults received subthreshold single-pulse TMS at the motor hotspot during 64-channel EEG recording. The mu-phase at the time of TMS delivery was estimated using autoregression-based forward prediction and categorized into four bins (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°). The cortical responses were assessed using inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC), TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), global mean field power (GMFP), and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP). Results: Phase estimation reliably distinguished four mu-phase bins. Subthreshold TMS–EEG responses showed clear phase dependence: early ITPC and several TEP components (N15, P30, N45, P60, and N100) differed significantly across phases, with 180° and 270° often eliciting stronger responses. GMFP revealed robust phase effects at mid-latency components, and TMS-induced mu-rhythms were the greatest at 180°. Conclusions: Our results showed that the EEG phase significantly modulates cortical reactivity at subthreshold stimulation levels, supporting mu-phase-based closed-loop TMS as a promising strategy for precise neuromodulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13040391
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mu-Rhythm Phase Modulates Cortical Reactivity to Subthreshold TMS: A TMS–EEG Study

J L Jin, Wenshu Mai, Yuezhuo Zhao, Jiankang Wu et al.
Bioengineering
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Mu-Rhythm Phase Modulates Cortical Reactivity to Subthreshold TMS: A TMS–EEG Study

J L Jin, Wenshu Mai, Yuezhuo Zhao, Jiankang Wu, Panli Chen, Zhipeng Liu, He Wang, Ying Li, Tao Yin, Xin Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: The phase of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals critically influences cortical reactivity to external inputs. Phase-dependent effects and their sensitivity to stimulation intensity have been observed at suprathreshold levels, while subthreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) cannot induce motor evoked potentials (MEPs), resulting in limited research on phase-dependent responses under subthreshold stimulation. In this study, we used a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS–EEG) approach to examine how the ongoing EEG phase influences cortical responses at subthreshold intensity and to characterize these responses in terms of temporal, spatial, and spectral features. Methods: Thirty-four healthy adults received subthreshold single-pulse TMS at the motor hotspot during 64-channel EEG recording. The mu-phase at the time of TMS delivery was estimated using autoregression-based forward prediction and categorized into four bins (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°). The cortical responses were assessed using inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC), TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), global mean field power (GMFP), and event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP). Results: Phase estimation reliably distinguished four mu-phase bins. Subthreshold TMS–EEG responses showed clear phase dependence: early ITPC and several TEP components (N15, P30, N45, P60, and N100) differed significantly across phases, with 180° and 270° often eliciting stronger responses. GMFP revealed robust phase effects at mid-latency components, and TMS-induced mu-rhythms were the greatest at 180°. Conclusions: Our results showed that the EEG phase significantly modulates cortical reactivity at subthreshold stimulation levels, supporting mu-phase-based closed-loop TMS as a promising strategy for precise neuromodulation.

BioengineeringVol. 13(4)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.