From multimaterial to monomaterial: An LCA of flexible coffee packaging

While flexible food packaging plays a vital role in food preservation and waste reduction, there are growing concerns and regulatory pressures regarding its environmental footprint, particularly its production and end-of-life management. To quantify these impacts and guide more sustainable design, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a crucial tool. This study presents a comparative LCA of a multimaterial coffee package and two monomaterial alternatives (polyethylene and polypropylene). The analysis adopted a “cradle-to-gate-with-end-of-life” framework, following ISO 14040/44 guidelines, to evaluate a current baseline scenario and future end-of-life scenarios for 2030 and 2035 based on European recycling targets. The results indicate that monomaterial designs offer substantial environmental benefits, including a 50% reduction in the carbon footprint and lower impacts across most impact categories. Projections indicate that, even with improved future recycling technologies, the multimaterial package's impacts would still exceed those of monomaterial versions, confirming the benefits of packaging designed for enhanced recyclability. A trade-off in barrier properties is observed with monomaterial structures; however, their environmental advantages highlight their potential as a sustainable alternative. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the development of monomaterial packaging is a promising pathway toward achieving sustainability goals, and that LCA is essential for guiding future innovation. • LCA comparison of multi- and monomaterial flexible coffee packaging. • Monomaterial designs yield 50% lower carbon footprint than standard designs. • Future recycling scenarios were modelled to forecast potential impacts. • The study reveals a trade-off between environmental benefit and barrier properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable materials and technologies
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2026.e01979
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From multimaterial to monomaterial: An LCA of flexible coffee packaging

Matteo Cigada, Rosi Barrale, G Dotelli
Sustainable materials and technologies
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

From multimaterial to monomaterial: An LCA of flexible coffee packaging

Matteo Cigada, Rosi Barrale, G Dotelli
article en

Abstract

While flexible food packaging plays a vital role in food preservation and waste reduction, there are growing concerns and regulatory pressures regarding its environmental footprint, particularly its production and end-of-life management. To quantify these impacts and guide more sustainable design, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a crucial tool. This study presents a comparative LCA of a multimaterial coffee package and two monomaterial alternatives (polyethylene and polypropylene). The analysis adopted a “cradle-to-gate-with-end-of-life” framework, following ISO 14040/44 guidelines, to evaluate a current baseline scenario and future end-of-life scenarios for 2030 and 2035 based on European recycling targets. The results indicate that monomaterial designs offer substantial environmental benefits, including a 50% reduction in the carbon footprint and lower impacts across most impact categories. Projections indicate that, even with improved future recycling technologies, the multimaterial package's impacts would still exceed those of monomaterial versions, confirming the benefits of packaging designed for enhanced recyclability. A trade-off in barrier properties is observed with monomaterial structures; however, their environmental advantages highlight their potential as a sustainable alternative. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the development of monomaterial packaging is a promising pathway toward achieving sustainability goals, and that LCA is essential for guiding future innovation. • LCA comparison of multi- and monomaterial flexible coffee packaging. • Monomaterial designs yield 50% lower carbon footprint than standard designs. • Future recycling scenarios were modelled to forecast potential impacts. • The study reveals a trade-off between environmental benefit and barrier properties.

Sustainable materials and technologies
Piaggio Aerospace (Italy) (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.