SRS363 - STARS-EoE: a survey of training and attitudes in robotic surgery in the east of England

Abstract Background Robotic surgery is increasingly adopted across general surgical units in the United Kingdom, yet training opportunities remain inconsistent. This study explored the experiences, attitudes, and perceived barriers to robotic training among General Surgery higher surgical trainees in the East of England (EoE) deanery, with the aim of identifying areas for improvement to enhance future training provision. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods electronic survey was distributed to all ST3–ST8 General Surgery trainees in the EoE deanery (May–August 2025). Eligible participants were in a clinically active general surgical rotation within an EoE hospital. The 27-item questionnaire examined professional background, exposure to robotic surgery, and perceptions of training. Results Of 81 eligible trainees, 48 responded (59%), with representation from all 16 hospitals, 13 of which performed robotic procedures. Almost all respondents (98%) believed that robotic surgery would become integral to general surgical practice, and 77% intended to undertake a fellowship in robotic surgery. Twenty-seven trainees were in firms performing robotic cases, with a median exposure of one operating session per week. Satisfaction with training was low (mean 3.8/10). Independent console operating was rare (7%), with limited access to simulation (23%), structured induction (17%), and robotic courses (52%). Conclusions Trainees view robotic surgery as a valuable skill, yet current training opportunities are inadequate, inequitable and show marked variation between hospitals. Priorities for improvement include national curriculum integration, equitable access to simulation and formal training courses, and expansion of dual console operating to support safe progression from bedside assistance to independent practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.320
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS363 - STARS-EoE: a survey of training and attitudes in robotic surgery in the east of England

T. Shakir, Nicholas Penney, Sri Sivarajan
British journal of surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

SRS363 - STARS-EoE: a survey of training and attitudes in robotic surgery in the east of England

T. Shakir, Nicholas Penney, Sri Sivarajan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Robotic surgery is increasingly adopted across general surgical units in the United Kingdom, yet training opportunities remain inconsistent. This study explored the experiences, attitudes, and perceived barriers to robotic training among General Surgery higher surgical trainees in the East of England (EoE) deanery, with the aim of identifying areas for improvement to enhance future training provision. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods electronic survey was distributed to all ST3–ST8 General Surgery trainees in the EoE deanery (May–August 2025). Eligible participants were in a clinically active general surgical rotation within an EoE hospital. The 27-item questionnaire examined professional background, exposure to robotic surgery, and perceptions of training. Results Of 81 eligible trainees, 48 responded (59%), with representation from all 16 hospitals, 13 of which performed robotic procedures. Almost all respondents (98%) believed that robotic surgery would become integral to general surgical practice, and 77% intended to undertake a fellowship in robotic surgery. Twenty-seven trainees were in firms performing robotic cases, with a median exposure of one operating session per week. Satisfaction with training was low (mean 3.8/10). Independent console operating was rare (7%), with limited access to simulation (23%), structured induction (17%), and robotic courses (52%). Conclusions Trainees view robotic surgery as a valuable skill, yet current training opportunities are inadequate, inequitable and show marked variation between hospitals. Priorities for improvement include national curriculum integration, equitable access to simulation and formal training courses, and expansion of dual console operating to support safe progression from bedside assistance to independent practice.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
University of East Anglia (GB), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.