SRS113 - The variation in revision rates for Total Hip (THR), Knee (TKR), and Shoulder (TSR) implants submitted for the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) benchmarks

Abstract Background Since 2003, the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) has benchmarked orthopaedic implants using revision rates at specific time points, progressively tightening these standards to match global improvements. ODEP assigns A*, A, and B ratings based on evidence strength. This study evaluates revision rate variation among Total Hip Replacement (THR), Total Knee Replacement (TKR), and Total Shoulder Replacement (TSR) implants submitted for ODEP benchmarking since 2021. The goals were to analyse variation, suggest updated survival thresholds, and assess registry-related differences. Methods Revision data for 364 THR, 534 TKR, and 128 TSR implants from 2021 onward were analysed. Revision rates were plotted against benchmarks at 3, 5, 7, 10, 13, and 15 years. Registries were noted, and implant data anonymised. Results Revision rates increased over time across all joints, with notable variation between implants at each benchmark. Registry source sometimes influenced rates. Some implants maintained revision rates comparable to early benchmarks (3 years) even at 15 years. Proposed reductions in revision thresholds would reclassify several implants, mainly affecting THR after 7 years and TKR from year 5, especially at 13 and 15 years. Conclusions Lowering revision thresholds for A and A* ratings would substantially impact implant classifications, supporting updates to survival benchmarks to reflect current implant performance. Disclosure No conflicts of interest or funding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.109
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS113 - The variation in revision rates for Total Hip (THR), Knee (TKR), and Shoulder (TSR) implants submitted for the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) benchmarks

Olga Taylor, John Tucker, Hussayn Shinwari, Robert Scott
British journal of surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

SRS113 - The variation in revision rates for Total Hip (THR), Knee (TKR), and Shoulder (TSR) implants submitted for the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) benchmarks

Olga Taylor, John Tucker, Hussayn Shinwari, Robert Scott
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Since 2003, the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) has benchmarked orthopaedic implants using revision rates at specific time points, progressively tightening these standards to match global improvements. ODEP assigns A*, A, and B ratings based on evidence strength. This study evaluates revision rate variation among Total Hip Replacement (THR), Total Knee Replacement (TKR), and Total Shoulder Replacement (TSR) implants submitted for ODEP benchmarking since 2021. The goals were to analyse variation, suggest updated survival thresholds, and assess registry-related differences. Methods Revision data for 364 THR, 534 TKR, and 128 TSR implants from 2021 onward were analysed. Revision rates were plotted against benchmarks at 3, 5, 7, 10, 13, and 15 years. Registries were noted, and implant data anonymised. Results Revision rates increased over time across all joints, with notable variation between implants at each benchmark. Registry source sometimes influenced rates. Some implants maintained revision rates comparable to early benchmarks (3 years) even at 15 years. Proposed reductions in revision thresholds would reclassify several implants, mainly affecting THR after 7 years and TKR from year 5, especially at 13 and 15 years. Conclusions Lowering revision thresholds for A and A* ratings would substantially impact implant classifications, supporting updates to survival benchmarks to reflect current implant performance. Disclosure No conflicts of interest or funding.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
St George's, University of London (GB), Hemel Hempstead Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SRS113 - The variation in revision rates for Total Hip (THR), Knee (TKR), and Shoulder (TSR) implants submitted for the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) benchmarks — Olga Taylor, John Tucker, et al. · British journal of surgery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS