Access to Justice After <i>Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic</i>

This Viewpoint discusses the importance of patient and physician lawsuits and how the 2025 US Supreme Court decision Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic may impede access to justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Health Forum
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2026.0072
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to Justice After Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic

Nicole Huberfeld, Daniel G. Aaron
JAMA Health Forum
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

Access to Justice After Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic

Nicole Huberfeld, Daniel G. Aaron
article en

Abstract

This Viewpoint discusses the importance of patient and physician lawsuits and how the 2025 US Supreme Court decision Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic may impede access to justice.

JAMA Health ForumVol. 7(3)
Boston University (US), University of Utah (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Access to Justice After <i>Medina v Planned Parenthood South Atlantic</i> — Nicole Huberfeld, Daniel G. Aaron · JAMA Health Forum (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS