Staying in the Tent: Why Infectious Disease Physicians Remain Essential to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Primary Care

Since the beginning of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the United States, infectious disease (ID) specialists have provided HIV and primary care for people with HIV. As patients often now have controlled HIV but increasing comorbidities, some advocate that ID specialists shift away from HIV primary care. However, shortages of primary care providers and non-ID-trained HIV providers mean ID specialists stepping back could leave patients without care. In addition, many patients prefer consolidated care and find engaging with multiple providers challenging. Regional differences in HIV burden, morbidity, and mortality also make a uniform approach to who provides HIV primary care impractical. Maintaining ID specialists as primary care physicians supports patients, contributes to the HIV workforce, and may promote trainee interest in ID. Investments in training, education, and innovative care models are essential to expand the HIV workforce and enable ID specialists to keep patients at the center by serving as HIV primary care physicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciag097
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Staying in the Tent: Why Infectious Disease Physicians Remain Essential to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Primary Care

Natasha Chida
Clinical Infectious Diseases
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Staying in the Tent: Why Infectious Disease Physicians Remain Essential to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Primary Care

Natasha Chida
article en

Abstract

Since the beginning of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the United States, infectious disease (ID) specialists have provided HIV and primary care for people with HIV. As patients often now have controlled HIV but increasing comorbidities, some advocate that ID specialists shift away from HIV primary care. However, shortages of primary care providers and non-ID-trained HIV providers mean ID specialists stepping back could leave patients without care. In addition, many patients prefer consolidated care and find engaging with multiple providers challenging. Regional differences in HIV burden, morbidity, and mortality also make a uniform approach to who provides HIV primary care impractical. Maintaining ID specialists as primary care physicians supports patients, contributes to the HIV workforce, and may promote trainee interest in ID. Investments in training, education, and innovative care models are essential to expand the HIV workforce and enable ID specialists to keep patients at the center by serving as HIV primary care physicians.

Clinical Infectious Diseases
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Staying in the Tent: Why Infectious Disease Physicians Remain Essential to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Primary Care — Natasha Chida · Clinical Infectious Diseases (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS