The green mandate: Gen Z’s role in shaping corporate sustainability

Purpose This study aims to examine how urban Indian Generation Z (Gen Z) construct expectations of corporate environmental responsibility (CER) in the context of lived environmental degradation. It explores how everyday experiences of pollution shape corporate expectations, what motivates or constrains Gen Z’s engagement with sustainable behaviours and how social, digital and educational contexts influence their interpretation and evaluation of CER. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a qualitative, exploratory design based on semi-structured interviews with 48 urban Gen Z participants (aged 21–26), including postgraduate students and early-career professionals. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, supported by NVivo 14. Stakeholder theory, the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the value-belief-norm (VBN) framework were used as sensitising frameworks to inform interpretation, while themes were inductively derived from the data. Findings The findings reveal strong expectations for authenticity, transparency and verifiable corporate environmental action, with participants expressing scepticism towards symbolic or compliance-driven ESG disclosures. Moral responsibility and peer influence emerged as key motivators of sustainable engagement, while affordability, accessibility and convenience constrained behavioural enactment. Social and digital environments heightened scrutiny of corporate claims, positioning Gen Z as active evaluators of CER within digitally mediated stakeholder networks. Research limitations/implications The study focuses on urban, educated and digitally connected Gen Z participants, which may limit transferability to less-connected populations. Future research could adopt longitudinal and comparative designs across regions and economies to examine how expectations evolve over time. Practical implications For organisations, the findings underscore the need to move beyond symbolic ESG communication towards transparent, measurable and locally responsive environmental actions. Digital credibility and consistency are critical for engaging younger stakeholder groups. Social implications Gen Z’s expectations reflect a shift towards collective accountability and heightened scrutiny of corporate environmental conduct. Their evaluative role within digital ecosystems has implications for broader societal debates on environmental governance and CER. Originality/value By shifting focus from consumption intentions to expectations of CER, this study extends stakeholder and behavioural research through a context-rich qualitative account from an emerging economy. It demonstrates how lived environmental exposure and digital information environments reshape stakeholder legitimacy judgements in ways underexplored in existing models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Responsibility Journal
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-07-2025-0752
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The green mandate: Gen Z’s role in shaping corporate sustainability

Amit Gupta, Sonam Chawla
Social Responsibility Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The green mandate: Gen Z’s role in shaping corporate sustainability

Amit Gupta, Sonam Chawla
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how urban Indian Generation Z (Gen Z) construct expectations of corporate environmental responsibility (CER) in the context of lived environmental degradation. It explores how everyday experiences of pollution shape corporate expectations, what motivates or constrains Gen Z’s engagement with sustainable behaviours and how social, digital and educational contexts influence their interpretation and evaluation of CER. Design/methodology/approach The study adopts a qualitative, exploratory design based on semi-structured interviews with 48 urban Gen Z participants (aged 21–26), including postgraduate students and early-career professionals. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, supported by NVivo 14. Stakeholder theory, the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and the value-belief-norm (VBN) framework were used as sensitising frameworks to inform interpretation, while themes were inductively derived from the data. Findings The findings reveal strong expectations for authenticity, transparency and verifiable corporate environmental action, with participants expressing scepticism towards symbolic or compliance-driven ESG disclosures. Moral responsibility and peer influence emerged as key motivators of sustainable engagement, while affordability, accessibility and convenience constrained behavioural enactment. Social and digital environments heightened scrutiny of corporate claims, positioning Gen Z as active evaluators of CER within digitally mediated stakeholder networks. Research limitations/implications The study focuses on urban, educated and digitally connected Gen Z participants, which may limit transferability to less-connected populations. Future research could adopt longitudinal and comparative designs across regions and economies to examine how expectations evolve over time. Practical implications For organisations, the findings underscore the need to move beyond symbolic ESG communication towards transparent, measurable and locally responsive environmental actions. Digital credibility and consistency are critical for engaging younger stakeholder groups. Social implications Gen Z’s expectations reflect a shift towards collective accountability and heightened scrutiny of corporate environmental conduct. Their evaluative role within digital ecosystems has implications for broader societal debates on environmental governance and CER. Originality/value By shifting focus from consumption intentions to expectations of CER, this study extends stakeholder and behavioural research through a context-rich qualitative account from an emerging economy. It demonstrates how lived environmental exposure and digital information environments reshape stakeholder legitimacy judgements in ways underexplored in existing models.

Social Responsibility Journal
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Sigma Research (United States) (US), Global University (LB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.