The relationship between in-group favoritism and online prosocial behaviors among college students: the role of moral self and the belief in a just world

Objective This study aims to explore the joint mechanism of in-group favoritism and belief in a just world on individual online prosocial behaviors among college students in the context of online donation, with a focus on the mediating role of the moral self and the moderating role of belief in a just world. Method A online donation scenario was created through experimental methods to manipulate participants' in-group favoritism (high vs. low) and belief in a just world (priming group vs. control group). Their moral self-level and online prosocial behavior (using comment word count as an indicator of expressive prosocial behavior) were measured. Results (1) In-group favoritism significantly and positively predicted online prosocial behavior; (2) The moral self played a significant mediating role between in-group favoritism and online prosocial behavior; (3) Belief in a just world moderated the influence of in-group favoritism on the moral self. Under the condition of activated belief in a just world, the positive predictive effect of in-group favoritism on the moral self was stronger, thereby indirectly affecting prosocial behavior through the moral self. Conclusion The present study found that the moral self serves as an internal psychological mechanism through which in-group favoritism influences online prosocial behavior, and that belief in a just world moderates this mechanism. These findings provide a new theoretical perspective for understanding the driving factors of prosocial behavior in online contexts and offer practical implications for guiding college students' online prosocial behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1704571
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between in-group favoritism and online prosocial behaviors among college students: the role of moral self and the belief in a just world

Keke Zhang, Qingsong Sang, Cheng Chen
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

The relationship between in-group favoritism and online prosocial behaviors among college students: the role of moral self and the belief in a just world

Keke Zhang, Qingsong Sang, Cheng Chen
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aims to explore the joint mechanism of in-group favoritism and belief in a just world on individual online prosocial behaviors among college students in the context of online donation, with a focus on the mediating role of the moral self and the moderating role of belief in a just world. Method A online donation scenario was created through experimental methods to manipulate participants' in-group favoritism (high vs. low) and belief in a just world (priming group vs. control group). Their moral self-level and online prosocial behavior (using comment word count as an indicator of expressive prosocial behavior) were measured. Results (1) In-group favoritism significantly and positively predicted online prosocial behavior; (2) The moral self played a significant mediating role between in-group favoritism and online prosocial behavior; (3) Belief in a just world moderated the influence of in-group favoritism on the moral self. Under the condition of activated belief in a just world, the positive predictive effect of in-group favoritism on the moral self was stronger, thereby indirectly affecting prosocial behavior through the moral self. Conclusion The present study found that the moral self serves as an internal psychological mechanism through which in-group favoritism influences online prosocial behavior, and that belief in a just world moderates this mechanism. These findings provide a new theoretical perspective for understanding the driving factors of prosocial behavior in online contexts and offer practical implications for guiding college students' online prosocial behavior.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Anhui Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.