SRS166 - Comparison of virtual reality and 2D imaging in neuroblastoma surgical planning

Abstract Background Radical neuroblastoma resection is complex, requiring detailed knowledge of tumour–organ–vessel anatomy. Planning traditionally relies on Image-Defined Risk Factors (IDRFs) from CT/MRI. Virtual reality (VR) provides immersive 3D reconstructions with depth perception and interactive features, improving anatomical visualisation. This study evaluates whether VR provides advantages over conventional 2D imaging for preoperative planning and training in abdominal neuroblastoma. Methods CT scans of nine high-risk neuroblastoma patients treated at GOSH were segmented in Materialise Mimics 24.0 to generate VR 3D models. Paediatric surgical trainees and consultants assessed each case using CT and VR, scoring vascular/organ involvement, evaluating resection feasibility, and rating confidence and anatomical understanding. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests. Results VR significantly improved anatomical assessment over CT (P < 0.001). Accuracy increased with expertise: consultants improved 7% (P < 0.05) and senior registrars 12.5% (P < 0.01). VR enhanced interpretation of IDRFs (P < 0.01), vessels (P < 0.05), and organs (P < 0.05), reducing expertise-related performance gaps. The use of VR prompted a change in the preoperative plan in 78.1% of cases. In assessments of confidence and anatomical understanding, VR consistently outperformed CT in key areas such as anatomical interpretation, surgical strategy planning, and perception of case complexity. Feedback showed 67% valued VR for patient communication. Two-thirds reported improved decision-making, one-third noted anatomical detail limitations, and 83% emphasised its intuitive, low-training interface. Conclusions VR outperformed CT in anatomical interpretation, surgical planning, and perceived case complexity. While currently complementary to standard imaging, it holds potential to become central in surgical planning and training for neuroblastoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.160
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS166 - Comparison of virtual reality and 2D imaging in neuroblastoma surgical planning

Silvia Schievano, Jonathan J Neville, Laura Privitera, Stefano Giuliani et al.
British journal of surgery
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

SRS166 - Comparison of virtual reality and 2D imaging in neuroblastoma surgical planning

Silvia Schievano, Jonathan J Neville, Laura Privitera, Stefano Giuliani, Alex Dudko, Rachel Wan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Radical neuroblastoma resection is complex, requiring detailed knowledge of tumour–organ–vessel anatomy. Planning traditionally relies on Image-Defined Risk Factors (IDRFs) from CT/MRI. Virtual reality (VR) provides immersive 3D reconstructions with depth perception and interactive features, improving anatomical visualisation. This study evaluates whether VR provides advantages over conventional 2D imaging for preoperative planning and training in abdominal neuroblastoma. Methods CT scans of nine high-risk neuroblastoma patients treated at GOSH were segmented in Materialise Mimics 24.0 to generate VR 3D models. Paediatric surgical trainees and consultants assessed each case using CT and VR, scoring vascular/organ involvement, evaluating resection feasibility, and rating confidence and anatomical understanding. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney tests. Results VR significantly improved anatomical assessment over CT (P < 0.001). Accuracy increased with expertise: consultants improved 7% (P < 0.05) and senior registrars 12.5% (P < 0.01). VR enhanced interpretation of IDRFs (P < 0.01), vessels (P < 0.05), and organs (P < 0.05), reducing expertise-related performance gaps. The use of VR prompted a change in the preoperative plan in 78.1% of cases. In assessments of confidence and anatomical understanding, VR consistently outperformed CT in key areas such as anatomical interpretation, surgical strategy planning, and perception of case complexity. Feedback showed 67% valued VR for patient communication. Two-thirds reported improved decision-making, one-third noted anatomical detail limitations, and 83% emphasised its intuitive, low-training interface. Conclusions VR outperformed CT in anatomical interpretation, surgical planning, and perceived case complexity. While currently complementary to standard imaging, it holds potential to become central in surgical planning and training for neuroblastoma.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.