Reconsidering biologic treatment recommendations for CRSwNP without asthma in EUFOREA guidelines

The recently published EUFOREA pocket guide "Biologics in Upper and Lower Airway Diseases" summarises recommendati-ons on the use of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and asthma (1) and offers advice on biologic choice for practicing clinicians. The creation of this pocket guide, in the absence of any head-to-head studies at that time, drew on expert opinions and published indirect treatment compari-son (ITC) approaches (2,3). It makes a single recommendation for a preferred biologic, in patients affected by CRSwNP, without concomitant asthma (apart from specific cases such as pregnan-cy), whilst offering different options in asthma endotypes and phenotypes. We wish to draw the attention of the readership to some additional considerations relating to biologic choice for these diseases and how they are classified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rhinology Journal
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4193/rhin25.359
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering biologic treatment recommendations for CRSwNP without asthma in EUFOREA guidelines

Juan M. Solano, Peter Howarth, Ibon Eguíluz-Gracia, K Kallinikou et al.
Rhinology Journal
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

Reconsidering biologic treatment recommendations for CRSwNP without asthma in EUFOREA guidelines

Juan M. Solano, Peter Howarth, Ibon Eguíluz-Gracia, K Kallinikou, C Tacon, J Oppenheimer, A Bourdin, G W Canonica, P Chanez, M Bonini
article en

Abstract

The recently published EUFOREA pocket guide "Biologics in Upper and Lower Airway Diseases" summarises recommendati-ons on the use of biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and asthma (1) and offers advice on biologic choice for practicing clinicians. The creation of this pocket guide, in the absence of any head-to-head studies at that time, drew on expert opinions and published indirect treatment compari-son (ITC) approaches (2,3). It makes a single recommendation for a preferred biologic, in patients affected by CRSwNP, without concomitant asthma (apart from specific cases such as pregnan-cy), whilst offering different options in asthma endotypes and phenotypes. We wish to draw the attention of the readership to some additional considerations relating to biologic choice for these diseases and how they are classified.

Rhinology JournalVol. 0(0)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Humanitas University (IT), Inserm (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Age UK (GB), Physiologie et Médecine Expérimentale du Coeur et des Muscles (FR), Lung Institute (US), Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (ES), Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES), Athens State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.