SRS160 - PRE-excision CharacterISation of rEctal tumours (PRECISE Study): assessing preoperative methods for detecting malignancy within significant rectal polyps

Abstract Introduction Correct stratification of patients before local excision of rectal neoplasia depends on accurate characterisation. However, current imaging modalities may be prone to over-staging such lesions. This study assesses methods for detecting cancer within rectal polyps prior to transanal endoscopic surgery (TES). Methods Demographic and outcome data was collected from patients who underwent TES over five years. Preoperative investigational methods were assessed for sensitivity and specificity for malignancy. Results 553 cases were included (36.2% malignant). Mean tumour size was 34.1mm (SD = 19.0), mean distance from the anal verge was 6.5cm (SD = 3.0). Preoperative histology had a sensitivity of 48.7%. MRI had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 38.5%. Endorectal ultrasound (EUS) had a sensitivity of 92.6% and specificity of 15.9%. In instances where MRI was sensitive to cancer presence, cT-stage was correct in 41%, with 80% of pT1 lesions over-staged. For EUS, cT-stage was correct in 52.2%, with 70% of pT1 cancers over-staged. MRI and EUS correctly identified lesions as being locally resectable (≤T1) in 41.7% and 43.1% respectively. Clinician opinion showed a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 87.2%. 27.4% of malignancies were undetected prior to excision. Margins were clear of adenoma 87.5% of cases. R0 resection rate for was 90.5% for malignant lesions. Major morbidity occurred in 3.3%. Local recurrence was detected in 8.1% at mean follow-up of 16.9 months. Conclusions Imaging modalities show a propensity to over-stage rectal polyps undergoing local excision, potentially classifying them as unresectable. These findings should be taken into consideration during pre-excisional work-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.156
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS160 - PRE-excision CharacterISation of rEctal tumours (PRECISE Study): assessing preoperative methods for detecting malignancy within significant rectal polyps

Felix Aigner, Dara O. Kavanagh, Roel Hompes, Thalia Petropoulou et al.
British journal of surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

SRS160 - PRE-excision CharacterISation of rEctal tumours (PRECISE Study): assessing preoperative methods for detecting malignancy within significant rectal polyps

Felix Aigner, Dara O. Kavanagh, Roel Hompes, Thalia Petropoulou, R. Cahill, Patrick Boland, Matthew Albert, Attila Zaránd, Peter Neary, John Burke, Jurriaan Tuynman, Antonino Spinelli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Correct stratification of patients before local excision of rectal neoplasia depends on accurate characterisation. However, current imaging modalities may be prone to over-staging such lesions. This study assesses methods for detecting cancer within rectal polyps prior to transanal endoscopic surgery (TES). Methods Demographic and outcome data was collected from patients who underwent TES over five years. Preoperative investigational methods were assessed for sensitivity and specificity for malignancy. Results 553 cases were included (36.2% malignant). Mean tumour size was 34.1mm (SD = 19.0), mean distance from the anal verge was 6.5cm (SD = 3.0). Preoperative histology had a sensitivity of 48.7%. MRI had a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 38.5%. Endorectal ultrasound (EUS) had a sensitivity of 92.6% and specificity of 15.9%. In instances where MRI was sensitive to cancer presence, cT-stage was correct in 41%, with 80% of pT1 lesions over-staged. For EUS, cT-stage was correct in 52.2%, with 70% of pT1 cancers over-staged. MRI and EUS correctly identified lesions as being locally resectable (≤T1) in 41.7% and 43.1% respectively. Clinician opinion showed a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 87.2%. 27.4% of malignancies were undetected prior to excision. Margins were clear of adenoma 87.5% of cases. R0 resection rate for was 90.5% for malignant lesions. Major morbidity occurred in 3.3%. Local recurrence was detected in 8.1% at mean follow-up of 16.9 months. Conclusions Imaging modalities show a propensity to over-stage rectal polyps undergoing local excision, potentially classifying them as unresectable. These findings should be taken into consideration during pre-excisional work-up.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
University College Dublin (IE), St. John's Hospital (US), AdventHealth Orlando (US), University Hospital Waterford (IE), Beaumont Hospital (IE), Tallaght University Hospital (IE), Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (IE), Aretaeio Hospital (GR), St John of God Hospital (AU), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.