Thrombolysis in Direct Oral Anticoagulant–Treated Stroke Patients: Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Practice

Intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke after recent direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) ingestion remains controversial due to hemorrhagic risk, limited rapid testing and inconsistent reversal strategies. We conducted an invite-only, web-based cross-sectional survey of Canadian stroke centers using a structured questionnaire. DOAC level testing was inconsistently available, with 9/13 centers (69%) reporting access but 8/13 centers (61%) reporting turnaround times exceeding 30 minutes. Consequently, 9/13 centers (69%) did not routinely use DOAC levels to guide thrombolysis decisions. Current practice demonstrates substantial variability and uncertainty, highlighting important evidence gaps and the potential role of clinical trials and consensus guideline development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2026.10565
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thrombolysis in Direct Oral Anticoagulant–Treated Stroke Patients: Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Practice

Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini, Aravind Ganesh, Bijoy K. Menon, Mohammed A. Almekhlafi et al.
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Thrombolysis in Direct Oral Anticoagulant–Treated Stroke Patients: Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Practice

Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini, Aravind Ganesh, Bijoy K. Menon, Mohammed A. Almekhlafi, Nishita Singh
article en

Abstract

Intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke after recent direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) ingestion remains controversial due to hemorrhagic risk, limited rapid testing and inconsistent reversal strategies. We conducted an invite-only, web-based cross-sectional survey of Canadian stroke centers using a structured questionnaire. DOAC level testing was inconsistently available, with 9/13 centers (69%) reporting access but 8/13 centers (61%) reporting turnaround times exceeding 30 minutes. Consequently, 9/13 centers (69%) did not routinely use DOAC levels to guide thrombolysis decisions. Current practice demonstrates substantial variability and uncertainty, highlighting important evidence gaps and the potential role of clinical trials and consensus guideline development.

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
University of Calgary (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Thrombolysis in Direct Oral Anticoagulant–Treated Stroke Patients: Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Practice — Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini, Aravind Ganesh, et al. · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS