Exploring the Perspectives of Patients and Healthcare Providers on Rheumatology Clinical Trials: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary

Objectives: Clinical trials are essential for therapeutic innovation in rheumatology. A recent decline in clinical trial activity in Hungary has highlighted the need to better understand patient experiences and motivations. This study assessed patient satisfaction and motivation in clinical trials, compared these with routine specialist care, and evaluated healthcare professionals’ motivations. Methods: In this single-center, cross-sectional study, 129 patients completed self-administered questionnaires (61 trial participants and 68 receiving routine care) primarily using a 6-point Likert scale; additionally, 21 healthcare professionals rated their motivations on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0–10). Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, and continuous variables using paired two-tailed t-tests. Results: The main drivers of trial participation were physician recommendations (100%) and trust in the treating physician (100%). Access to novel therapies (98%), closer monitoring (83%), and additional diagnostic procedures (95%) were also significant motivators. Trial participants reported significantly higher satisfaction compared with routine care in terms of consultation time (97% vs. 36%, p < 0.001), staff availability (95% vs. 41, p < 0.001), assistance (93% vs. 36%, p < 0.001), and visit organization (98% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). Overall satisfaction with routine care remained high in both groups. In the control group, fears of disease worsening and the burden of frequent visits were key deterrents. Among healthcare professionals, access to innovative treatments was the strongest motivator, while administrative workload and documentation demands were the primary barriers. Conclusions: Clinical trial participation is associated with high patient satisfaction, driven by physician–patient trust and structured, personalized care. Reducing administrative burdens may be crucial for sustaining clinical research in academic settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072547
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Perspectives of Patients and Healthcare Providers on Rheumatology Clinical Trials: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary

Katalin Hodosi, M. Bodoki, Nóra Bodnár, Erzsébet Hunyadi et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
article

Exploring the Perspectives of Patients and Healthcare Providers on Rheumatology Clinical Trials: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary

Katalin Hodosi, M. Bodoki, Nóra Bodnár, Erzsébet Hunyadi, Zoltán Szekanecz, Andrea Domján
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical trials are essential for therapeutic innovation in rheumatology. A recent decline in clinical trial activity in Hungary has highlighted the need to better understand patient experiences and motivations. This study assessed patient satisfaction and motivation in clinical trials, compared these with routine specialist care, and evaluated healthcare professionals’ motivations. Methods: In this single-center, cross-sectional study, 129 patients completed self-administered questionnaires (61 trial participants and 68 receiving routine care) primarily using a 6-point Likert scale; additionally, 21 healthcare professionals rated their motivations on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0–10). Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, and continuous variables using paired two-tailed t-tests. Results: The main drivers of trial participation were physician recommendations (100%) and trust in the treating physician (100%). Access to novel therapies (98%), closer monitoring (83%), and additional diagnostic procedures (95%) were also significant motivators. Trial participants reported significantly higher satisfaction compared with routine care in terms of consultation time (97% vs. 36%, p < 0.001), staff availability (95% vs. 41, p < 0.001), assistance (93% vs. 36%, p < 0.001), and visit organization (98% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). Overall satisfaction with routine care remained high in both groups. In the control group, fears of disease worsening and the burden of frequent visits were key deterrents. Among healthcare professionals, access to innovative treatments was the strongest motivator, while administrative workload and documentation demands were the primary barriers. Conclusions: Clinical trial participation is associated with high patient satisfaction, driven by physician–patient trust and structured, personalized care. Reducing administrative burdens may be crucial for sustaining clinical research in academic settings.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(7)
University of Debrecen (HU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.