Comparing the Readability and Content Quality of Online Patient Education Materials and ChatGPT-Generated Patient Education Materials for Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction

Abstract Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and reconstruction seek information using online patient education materials (OPEMs). The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA) recommend a sixth-grade reading level for OPEMs. In recent years, Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a large language model (LLM), has shown potential utility in patient education. This study compares the readability and content quality of OPEMs on breast cancer surgery and reconstruction with ChatGPT-generated materials. Google searches were conducted in January 2025 to identify relevant OPEMs for breast cancer surgery and reconstruction. For each search term, ChatGPT 4.0 was prompted to generate patient education guides using two approaches: (1) Standard prompting and (2) simplified prompting to align with NIH/AHA recommendations (“write the guide like I am in sixth grade”). Readability and content quality metrics were assessed. Ninety-nine OPEMs and 60 ChatGPT responses (30 standard, 30 simplified) were analyzed. Median Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) was 10.8 for OPEMs, 10.0 for standard ChatGPT responses, and 5.8 for simplified ChatGPT responses. OPEMs and standard ChatGPT responses significantly exceeded NIH/AMA recommendations (p < 0.001). Simplified ChatGPT responses aligned with the sixth-grade level and were significantly easier to read than OPEMs and standard ChatGPT responses (p < 0.001). DISCERN scores did not significantly differ between OPEMs and standard/simplified ChatGPT responses. OPEMs on breast cancer surgery and reconstruction exceed recommended readability levels. ChatGPT, when prompted to simplify, produced materials consistent with NIH/AMA guidelines while maintaining content quality. Using ChatGPT for patient education may enhance accessibility and patient comprehension of health information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2794-9984
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Readability and Content Quality of Online Patient Education Materials and ChatGPT-Generated Patient Education Materials for Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction

Jeewon Chon, Anitesh Bajaj, Nikhil Sriram, Robert D. Galiano et al.
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Comparing the Readability and Content Quality of Online Patient Education Materials and ChatGPT-Generated Patient Education Materials for Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction

Jeewon Chon, Anitesh Bajaj, Nikhil Sriram, Robert D. Galiano, Tarifa H. Adam, May Li, Antoinette Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and reconstruction seek information using online patient education materials (OPEMs). The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Medical Association (AMA) recommend a sixth-grade reading level for OPEMs. In recent years, Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), a large language model (LLM), has shown potential utility in patient education. This study compares the readability and content quality of OPEMs on breast cancer surgery and reconstruction with ChatGPT-generated materials. Google searches were conducted in January 2025 to identify relevant OPEMs for breast cancer surgery and reconstruction. For each search term, ChatGPT 4.0 was prompted to generate patient education guides using two approaches: (1) Standard prompting and (2) simplified prompting to align with NIH/AHA recommendations (“write the guide like I am in sixth grade”). Readability and content quality metrics were assessed. Ninety-nine OPEMs and 60 ChatGPT responses (30 standard, 30 simplified) were analyzed. Median Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) was 10.8 for OPEMs, 10.0 for standard ChatGPT responses, and 5.8 for simplified ChatGPT responses. OPEMs and standard ChatGPT responses significantly exceeded NIH/AMA recommendations (p < 0.001). Simplified ChatGPT responses aligned with the sixth-grade level and were significantly easier to read than OPEMs and standard ChatGPT responses (p < 0.001). DISCERN scores did not significantly differ between OPEMs and standard/simplified ChatGPT responses. OPEMs on breast cancer surgery and reconstruction exceed recommended readability levels. ChatGPT, when prompted to simplify, produced materials consistent with NIH/AMA guidelines while maintaining content quality. Using ChatGPT for patient education may enhance accessibility and patient comprehension of health information.

Archives of Plastic SurgeryVol. 53(02)
Northwestern University (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), University of Rochester (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.