Fundamentals of MXene Synthesis Steps and Their Characterization Techniques: Morphological, Structural, and Electrochemical Properties

MXene phases, a rapidly expanding family of two‐dimensional transition metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, have grown to include more than 80 compositions since their discovery in 2011, owing to their exceptional electrical conductivity, tunable surface chemistry, and versatile functional properties that enable applications in energy storage, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, biomedical technologies, and ultrasensitive sensing systems. Common acidic etching methods, coupled with highly sensitive process requirements, pose significant challenges limiting the scalable synthesis of MXene phases, particularly for mass production. This review presents a comprehensive evaluation of MXene synthesis, including acid etching and safer fluoride‐free acid etching methods. hydrofluoric acid (HF)‐etching, fluoride‐free, molten salt, electrochemical, and hydrothermal methods are extensively discussed in terms of their respective advantages, limitations and their effects on surface terminations. Following etching, the subsequent stages of intercalation, delamination, and postsynthesis treatments are addressed to highlight strategies for achieving high‐purity, stable, and single or few‐layer MXene sheets while preserving their structural integrity and high quality. In addition, common characterization techniques such as X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Fourier‐transform spectroscopy (FTIR) are discussed comprehensively, and electrochemical performance methods—including band structure, cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)—are evaluated to correlate the morphological features of MXene phases with functional properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202500468
Primary Topic
MXene and MAX Phase Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamentals of MXene Synthesis Steps and Their Characterization Techniques: Morphological, Structural, and Electrochemical Properties

Safa Polat, Muhammet Enver Gökdemir, Manpreet Singh, Erkan Karataş et al.
ChemElectroChem
MXene and MAX Phase Materials
article

Fundamentals of MXene Synthesis Steps and Their Characterization Techniques: Morphological, Structural, and Electrochemical Properties

Safa Polat, Muhammet Enver Gökdemir, Manpreet Singh, Erkan Karataş, Mehmet Topuz, Yuksel Akinay, Rashad Gabil Oglu Abaszade, Huseyn Imanov, Tayfun Cetin
article en

Abstract

MXene phases, a rapidly expanding family of two‐dimensional transition metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, have grown to include more than 80 compositions since their discovery in 2011, owing to their exceptional electrical conductivity, tunable surface chemistry, and versatile functional properties that enable applications in energy storage, electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding, biomedical technologies, and ultrasensitive sensing systems. Common acidic etching methods, coupled with highly sensitive process requirements, pose significant challenges limiting the scalable synthesis of MXene phases, particularly for mass production. This review presents a comprehensive evaluation of MXene synthesis, including acid etching and safer fluoride‐free acid etching methods. hydrofluoric acid (HF)‐etching, fluoride‐free, molten salt, electrochemical, and hydrothermal methods are extensively discussed in terms of their respective advantages, limitations and their effects on surface terminations. Following etching, the subsequent stages of intercalation, delamination, and postsynthesis treatments are addressed to highlight strategies for achieving high‐purity, stable, and single or few‐layer MXene sheets while preserving their structural integrity and high quality. In addition, common characterization techniques such as X‐ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Fourier‐transform spectroscopy (FTIR) are discussed comprehensively, and electrochemical performance methods—including band structure, cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)—are evaluated to correlate the morphological features of MXene phases with functional properties.

ChemElectroChemVol. 13(7)
Lovely Professional University (IN), Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi (TR), Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University (AZ), Hakkari University (TR), Karabük University (TR), Erzurum Technical University (TR), Nakhchivan State University (AZ)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
MXene and MAX Phase Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.