Neighbouring in Present‐Day Sweden: The Role of Neighbourhood Type, Housing and Personality

ABSTRACT Interaction with neighbours is important not only for individual well‐being but also for social cohesion. This paper examines how neighbouring – the extent to which residents interact with their neighbours – varies across sociodemographic clusters beyond the conventional urban‐rural binary and investigates how housing characteristics and personality traits are further associated with neighbourly interactions. Utilising the Neighbourhood Survey 2020, a representative, large‐scale survey drawn from 10 distinct neighbourhood types across Sweden, the findings reveal that greeting neighbours is commonplace, but that talking to neighbours is rarer, while asking neighbours for help is not widespread. A significant portion of this variation stems from the neighbourhood context itself. Residents in homogeneous neighbourhoods in rural and urban areas exhibit higher levels of neighbourly interaction, while in diverse urban areas neighbouring is weaker. Homogeneity, and not diversity, thus fosters neighbouring. The type of neighbouring matters: asking neighbours for help is more common among migrants in deprived areas and among the poorest in rural homogeneous areas, while greeting neighbours is more common in homogeneous rural neighbourhoods, but not so much in small towns. Personality and housing characteristics also explain part of these patterns, with apartment dwellers and individuals scoring high in neuroticism neighbouring less, whereas those who are more extroverted and live in semi‑detached housing show greater neighbourly engagement. These results enrich ongoing debates around ethnic diversity, segregation, and social cohesion, pointing to increasing spatial polarisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Population Space and Place
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70245
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighbouring in Present‐Day Sweden: The Role of Neighbourhood Type, Housing and Personality

Karen Haandrikman
Population Space and Place
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

Neighbouring in Present‐Day Sweden: The Role of Neighbourhood Type, Housing and Personality

Karen Haandrikman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Interaction with neighbours is important not only for individual well‐being but also for social cohesion. This paper examines how neighbouring – the extent to which residents interact with their neighbours – varies across sociodemographic clusters beyond the conventional urban‐rural binary and investigates how housing characteristics and personality traits are further associated with neighbourly interactions. Utilising the Neighbourhood Survey 2020, a representative, large‐scale survey drawn from 10 distinct neighbourhood types across Sweden, the findings reveal that greeting neighbours is commonplace, but that talking to neighbours is rarer, while asking neighbours for help is not widespread. A significant portion of this variation stems from the neighbourhood context itself. Residents in homogeneous neighbourhoods in rural and urban areas exhibit higher levels of neighbourly interaction, while in diverse urban areas neighbouring is weaker. Homogeneity, and not diversity, thus fosters neighbouring. The type of neighbouring matters: asking neighbours for help is more common among migrants in deprived areas and among the poorest in rural homogeneous areas, while greeting neighbours is more common in homogeneous rural neighbourhoods, but not so much in small towns. Personality and housing characteristics also explain part of these patterns, with apartment dwellers and individuals scoring high in neuroticism neighbouring less, whereas those who are more extroverted and live in semi‑detached housing show greater neighbourly engagement. These results enrich ongoing debates around ethnic diversity, segregation, and social cohesion, pointing to increasing spatial polarisation.

Population Space and PlaceVol. 32(3)
Stockholm University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.