Affiliated Mutual Funds: Beyond the Reach of the Invisible Hand?

ABSTRACT In many countries, banks are the primary distribution channel for mutual funds and predominantly sell products issued by their own asset management divisions (“affiliated funds”). We examine how this lack of competition affects managerial activeness, fund performance, and investor outcomes. Using a comprehensive sample of German equity mutual funds from 2010 to 2024, we find that, all else equal, the probability of being a closet indexer—a fund marketed as actively managed but instead closely tracking its benchmark—is about 10 percentage points higher for affiliated funds, relative to a sample mean of 22%. Moreover, bank affiliation is a significant determinant of the underperformance of closet indexers. Flow analyses show that investors in affiliated funds display pronounced inertia, implying that underperformance translates into tangible welfare losses. Our findings highlight how exclusive distribution channels weaken competition and reduce investor protection in retail fund markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Management
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.70034
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affiliated Mutual Funds: Beyond the Reach of the Invisible Hand?

Oscar Anselm Stolper, Kim J. Heyden, Mario Fernandes, Dominik Scheld
Financial Management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

Affiliated Mutual Funds: Beyond the Reach of the Invisible Hand?

Oscar Anselm Stolper, Kim J. Heyden, Mario Fernandes, Dominik Scheld
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In many countries, banks are the primary distribution channel for mutual funds and predominantly sell products issued by their own asset management divisions (“affiliated funds”). We examine how this lack of competition affects managerial activeness, fund performance, and investor outcomes. Using a comprehensive sample of German equity mutual funds from 2010 to 2024, we find that, all else equal, the probability of being a closet indexer—a fund marketed as actively managed but instead closely tracking its benchmark—is about 10 percentage points higher for affiliated funds, relative to a sample mean of 22%. Moreover, bank affiliation is a significant determinant of the underperformance of closet indexers. Flow analyses show that investors in affiliated funds display pronounced inertia, implying that underperformance translates into tangible welfare losses. Our findings highlight how exclusive distribution channels weaken competition and reduce investor protection in retail fund markets.

Financial Management
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), Giessen School of Theology (DE), Frankfurt School of Finance & Management (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.