A comparative study on the influence of age-specific ocular anatomical differences on the prediction of post-ICL surgery vault

To evaluate the impact of age-related ocular anatomical changes on the accuracy of postoperative vault prediction following implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery and to identify key predictors for vault change (ΔVault). This retrospective study analyzed 2107 eyes that underwent ICL implantation (model V4c). Machine learning algorithms, including Light Gradient Boosting Machine, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, were used to construct two prediction models: a full-age cohort model (18–50 years, n = 2107) and a young cohort model (< 40 years, n = 1788). Furthermore, 426 eyes were stratified into three age-based groups for anatomical and dynamic vault analysis: Young group (18–30 years, n = 188), Middle-aged group (31–39 years, n = 134), and Older group (≥ 40 years, n = 104). The preoperative parameters were measured using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Model performance was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R²), mean absolute error, and mean square error. Anatomical parameters and dynamic postoperative vault changes were compared across the age groups. The prediction accuracy of the young cohort model (< 40 years) was significantly superior to that of the full-age cohort model (RMSE: 53.59 μm vs. 64.36 μm; R²: 0.896 vs. 0.881; P < 0.01). Anatomical analysis revealed a significant stepwise increase in lens thickness (LT) from the Young to the Older group (3.5131 ± 0.1962 mm, 3.5860 ± 0.2784 mm, 3.9212 ± 0.2470 mm, P < 0.001), whereas anterior chamber depth (ACD) progressively decreased (3.2662 ± 0.2877 mm, 3.1067 ± 0.1958 mm, 3.0440 ± 0.2317 mm, P < 0.001). The variability of ΔVault, defined as the difference between vault at 6 months postoperatively and vault at 1 day postoperatively, was greatest in the Older group (standard deviation = 122.55 μm), intermediate in the Middle-aged group (111.61 μm), and smallest in the Young group (67.62 μm). Feature importance analysis for ΔVault identified ciliary process length, maximum ciliary body thickness, and LT as the top three predictors. The inclusion of patients aged 40 years and older significantly reduces the performance of a universal vault prediction model. Older patients exhibit distinct ocular anatomical characteristics, including increased LT, altered ciliary body parameters, and poorer postoperative vault stability. These findings suggest the need to develop age-specific prediction models that incorporate dynamic anatomical factors to optimize surgical planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04762-4
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on the influence of age-specific ocular anatomical differences on the prediction of post-ICL surgery vault

Y. C. Li, Xuejun Fang, Jifan Wang, Yan Wang et al.
BMC Ophthalmology
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

A comparative study on the influence of age-specific ocular anatomical differences on the prediction of post-ICL surgery vault

Y. C. Li, Xuejun Fang, Jifan Wang, Yan Wang, Ying Li, Jiayu Pan
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of age-related ocular anatomical changes on the accuracy of postoperative vault prediction following implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery and to identify key predictors for vault change (ΔVault). This retrospective study analyzed 2107 eyes that underwent ICL implantation (model V4c). Machine learning algorithms, including Light Gradient Boosting Machine, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, were used to construct two prediction models: a full-age cohort model (18–50 years, n = 2107) and a young cohort model (< 40 years, n = 1788). Furthermore, 426 eyes were stratified into three age-based groups for anatomical and dynamic vault analysis: Young group (18–30 years, n = 188), Middle-aged group (31–39 years, n = 134), and Older group (≥ 40 years, n = 104). The preoperative parameters were measured using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Model performance was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R²), mean absolute error, and mean square error. Anatomical parameters and dynamic postoperative vault changes were compared across the age groups. The prediction accuracy of the young cohort model (< 40 years) was significantly superior to that of the full-age cohort model (RMSE: 53.59 μm vs. 64.36 μm; R²: 0.896 vs. 0.881; P < 0.01). Anatomical analysis revealed a significant stepwise increase in lens thickness (LT) from the Young to the Older group (3.5131 ± 0.1962 mm, 3.5860 ± 0.2784 mm, 3.9212 ± 0.2470 mm, P < 0.001), whereas anterior chamber depth (ACD) progressively decreased (3.2662 ± 0.2877 mm, 3.1067 ± 0.1958 mm, 3.0440 ± 0.2317 mm, P < 0.001). The variability of ΔVault, defined as the difference between vault at 6 months postoperatively and vault at 1 day postoperatively, was greatest in the Older group (standard deviation = 122.55 μm), intermediate in the Middle-aged group (111.61 μm), and smallest in the Young group (67.62 μm). Feature importance analysis for ΔVault identified ciliary process length, maximum ciliary body thickness, and LT as the top three predictors. The inclusion of patients aged 40 years and older significantly reduces the performance of a universal vault prediction model. Older patients exhibit distinct ocular anatomical characteristics, including increased LT, altered ciliary body parameters, and poorer postoperative vault stability. These findings suggest the need to develop age-specific prediction models that incorporate dynamic anatomical factors to optimize surgical planning.

BMC Ophthalmology
Central South University (CN), He Eye Hospital (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.