Fundamental Electrostatics Explains Why Ferredoxin- and HiPIP-Type Proteins Favor Different Redox Transitions in [4Fe-4S]-Cys <sub>4</sub> Clusters

[4Fe-4S] clusters in proteins typically occur in three distinct redox states: the oxidized state ([4Fe-4S]<sup>3+</sup>), the semireduced state ([4Fe-4S]<sup>2+</sup>), and the reduced state ([4Fe-4S]<sup>1+</sup>). Consequently, proteins containing these clusters could exhibit two distinct redox transitions: the low-potential transition (LPT: [4Fe-4S]<sup>1+</sup>/[4Fe-4S]<sup>2+</sup>) and the high-potential transition (HPT: [4Fe-4S]<sup>2+</sup>/[4Fe-4S]<sup>3+</sup>). However, individual proteins employ only one of them for their biological function. Despite sharing an identical inorganic cofactor, ferredoxins (Fds) consistently operate via the LPT, whereas high-potential iron-sulfur proteins (HiPIPs) exclusively use the HPT. In this study, we analyze the physical basis for the different behaviors of the two protein classes. Using continuum electrostatics, we calculate the redox potentials for both transitions across a representative selection of high-resolution protein structures from both classes. We find that transferring the cluster from water into the protein interior shifts both transitions to lower redox potentials, with the LPT experiencing a larger shift than the HPT. This larger shift is caused by the larger desolvation penalty due to the higher charge of the redox states involved in the LPT. As a result, the separation between the two transitions increases to about 1 V, matching values observed for model clusters in organic solvents. Protein background charges, including peptide bond dipoles, shift the redox potential of both transitions by nearly the same amount, tuning only one transition into the physiological redox window, while pushing the other transition outside of this window. These background charges stabilize the reduced state in both transitions, but the magnitude of this stabilization is substantially larger in Fds than in HiPIPs. Together, these effects position the native redox transition of each protein class at its physiological value, while shifting the non-native transition outside of the biologically accessible range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6c00593
Primary Topic
Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamental Electrostatics Explains Why Ferredoxin- and HiPIP-Type Proteins Favor Different Redox Transitions in [4Fe-4S]-Cys 4 Clusters

Rajeev Ranjan Roy, G. Matthias Ullmann, Maxim Janzen
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
article

Fundamental Electrostatics Explains Why Ferredoxin- and HiPIP-Type Proteins Favor Different Redox Transitions in [4Fe-4S]-Cys 4 Clusters

Rajeev Ranjan Roy, G. Matthias Ullmann, Maxim Janzen
article en

Abstract

[4Fe-4S] clusters in proteins typically occur in three distinct redox states: the oxidized state ([4Fe-4S]<sup>3+</sup>), the semireduced state ([4Fe-4S]<sup>2+</sup>), and the reduced state ([4Fe-4S]<sup>1+</sup>). Consequently, proteins containing these clusters could exhibit two distinct redox transitions: the low-potential transition (LPT: [4Fe-4S]<sup>1+</sup>/[4Fe-4S]<sup>2+</sup>) and the high-potential transition (HPT: [4Fe-4S]<sup>2+</sup>/[4Fe-4S]<sup>3+</sup>). However, individual proteins employ only one of them for their biological function. Despite sharing an identical inorganic cofactor, ferredoxins (Fds) consistently operate via the LPT, whereas high-potential iron-sulfur proteins (HiPIPs) exclusively use the HPT. In this study, we analyze the physical basis for the different behaviors of the two protein classes. Using continuum electrostatics, we calculate the redox potentials for both transitions across a representative selection of high-resolution protein structures from both classes. We find that transferring the cluster from water into the protein interior shifts both transitions to lower redox potentials, with the LPT experiencing a larger shift than the HPT. This larger shift is caused by the larger desolvation penalty due to the higher charge of the redox states involved in the LPT. As a result, the separation between the two transitions increases to about 1 V, matching values observed for model clusters in organic solvents. Protein background charges, including peptide bond dipoles, shift the redox potential of both transitions by nearly the same amount, tuning only one transition into the physiological redox window, while pushing the other transition outside of this window. These background charges stabilize the reduced state in both transitions, but the magnitude of this stabilization is substantially larger in Fds than in HiPIPs. Together, these effects position the native redox transition of each protein class at its physiological value, while shifting the non-native transition outside of the biologically accessible range.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
University of Bayreuth (DE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.