Improved aeroelastic analysis framework to assess shear and cross-section deformability effects on static aeroelastic response

This research investigates the influence of shear and cross-section deformability on the static aeroelastic response of wings by applying a high-fidelity computational framework that couples Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with refined one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) structural theories based on the Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF). The framework incorporates low- and higher-order beam and plate theories to capture airfoil deformations, utilizing both Taylor and Lagrange expansion functions for the kinematics. Aerodynamic loads from the CFD model are transferred to the structural finite element model via the Infinite Plate Spline (IPS) method. The static aeroelastic response of various wing configurations, differing in aspect ratio, airfoil geometry, and sweep angle, is analyzed to assess aerodynamic loading calculation and the influence of elastic airfoil deformation. Comparisons with reference solutions and Vortex Lattice Method (VLM) results demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the presented methodology, highlighting the importance of higher-order models for accurate aeroelastic static response of aeronautical wings. The study further demonstrates the stabilizing effects of sweep angles in mitigating aeroelastic instabilities, providing valuable insights for aerospace design. The results establish the framework as a powerful tool for preliminary aircraft design, enabling efficient aeroelastic assessments using efficient 1D finite elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100261437337
Primary Topic
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved aeroelastic analysis framework to assess shear and cross-section deformability effects on static aeroelastic response

Rodolfo Azzara, R. Ricci, M. Petrolo, Giacomo Zecchin et al.
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
article

Improved aeroelastic analysis framework to assess shear and cross-section deformability effects on static aeroelastic response

Rodolfo Azzara, R. Ricci, M. Petrolo, Giacomo Zecchin, Matteo Filippi
article en

Abstract

This research investigates the influence of shear and cross-section deformability on the static aeroelastic response of wings by applying a high-fidelity computational framework that couples Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with refined one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) structural theories based on the Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF). The framework incorporates low- and higher-order beam and plate theories to capture airfoil deformations, utilizing both Taylor and Lagrange expansion functions for the kinematics. Aerodynamic loads from the CFD model are transferred to the structural finite element model via the Infinite Plate Spline (IPS) method. The static aeroelastic response of various wing configurations, differing in aspect ratio, airfoil geometry, and sweep angle, is analyzed to assess aerodynamic loading calculation and the influence of elastic airfoil deformation. Comparisons with reference solutions and Vortex Lattice Method (VLM) results demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the presented methodology, highlighting the importance of higher-order models for accurate aeroelastic static response of aeronautical wings. The study further demonstrates the stabilizing effects of sweep angles in mitigating aeroelastic instabilities, providing valuable insights for aerospace design. The results establish the framework as a powerful tool for preliminary aircraft design, enabling efficient aeroelastic assessments using efficient 1D finite elements.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.