SRS313 - Negative pressure wound therapy in free flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Despite extensive research on negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), its impact on immediate post-operative application in free flap reconstruction remains underexplored. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT compared to conventional wound therapy (CWT) in post-operative management of free flap, focusing on flap survival, complication rates, and flap size. Methods Searches were carried out in CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase. All prospective or retrospective clinical studies examining the effect of immediate post-operative application of NPWT after free flap reconstruction were considered for the review. No restrictions were placed on the date of publication but only papers written in English were included. Results 13 studies were included in the review, with 6 studies eligible for the meta-analysis. A total of 321 free flaps were included in the pooled analysis. NPWT reduced overall complication rates compared to CWT (OR 0.34, 95% c.i. 0.13 to 0.88, P = 0.03, n = 240) and also resulted in a statistically significant reduction in flap size (SMD −1.54, 95% c.i. −2.48 to −0.54, P = 0.002, n = 43). However, there was no significant difference in flap survival rates (OR 2.34, 95% c.i. 0.77 to 7.09, P = 0.13, n = 252). Conclusions NPWT appears to offer benefits over CWT in reducing complications and flap size, but precautions should be taken in interpreting these results. Further high-quality randomised controlled trials are required to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znag018.285
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SRS313 - Negative pressure wound therapy in free flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kazuho Kawashima, Ali Esmaeli
British journal of surgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

SRS313 - Negative pressure wound therapy in free flap reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Kazuho Kawashima, Ali Esmaeli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite extensive research on negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), its impact on immediate post-operative application in free flap reconstruction remains underexplored. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT compared to conventional wound therapy (CWT) in post-operative management of free flap, focusing on flap survival, complication rates, and flap size. Methods Searches were carried out in CENTRAL, Medline, and Embase. All prospective or retrospective clinical studies examining the effect of immediate post-operative application of NPWT after free flap reconstruction were considered for the review. No restrictions were placed on the date of publication but only papers written in English were included. Results 13 studies were included in the review, with 6 studies eligible for the meta-analysis. A total of 321 free flaps were included in the pooled analysis. NPWT reduced overall complication rates compared to CWT (OR 0.34, 95% c.i. 0.13 to 0.88, P = 0.03, n = 240) and also resulted in a statistically significant reduction in flap size (SMD −1.54, 95% c.i. −2.48 to −0.54, P = 0.002, n = 43). However, there was no significant difference in flap survival rates (OR 2.34, 95% c.i. 0.77 to 7.09, P = 0.13, n = 252). Conclusions NPWT appears to offer benefits over CWT in reducing complications and flap size, but precautions should be taken in interpreting these results. Further high-quality randomised controlled trials are required to validate these findings.

British journal of surgeryVol. 113(Supplement_2)
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.