Pathways to cost-optimal and net-zero emissions irrigation in the United States

Irrigated agriculture enhances crop yields and climate resilience but also contributes to CO₂ emissions through energy use. Here, we apply energy system modeling to evaluate cost-emission trade-offs in electrified irrigation across the United States, integrating hourly energy production and historical water demand. We find that current practices are highly inefficient, leading to 23% (0.89 billion US dollar) higher costs and 39% (3.8 million metric tons of CO<sub>2</sub>) more CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared to the cost-optimal scenario, primarily due to reliance on diesel water pumps and limited solar photovoltaic adoption. Under cost-optimal conditions, 6.6 gigawatt of solar photovoltaic is deployed, and electric water pump installation capacity increase by 14% (11.3 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>) relative to current levels. Emission reductions of 85% are achievable at marginal additional cost (+0.7%), whereas reaching net-zero roughly doubles system costs relative to business-as-usual. Renewable-powered electrified irrigation can thus deliver substantial, low-cost emission reductions but requires operational adaptation to solar-based systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71122-7
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways to cost-optimal and net-zero emissions irrigation in the United States

Stefano Mingolla, Lorenzo Rosa, Jspaete
Nature Communications
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
article

Pathways to cost-optimal and net-zero emissions irrigation in the United States

Stefano Mingolla, Lorenzo Rosa, Jspaete
article en

Abstract

Irrigated agriculture enhances crop yields and climate resilience but also contributes to CO₂ emissions through energy use. Here, we apply energy system modeling to evaluate cost-emission trade-offs in electrified irrigation across the United States, integrating hourly energy production and historical water demand. We find that current practices are highly inefficient, leading to 23% (0.89 billion US dollar) higher costs and 39% (3.8 million metric tons of CO<sub>2</sub>) more CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared to the cost-optimal scenario, primarily due to reliance on diesel water pumps and limited solar photovoltaic adoption. Under cost-optimal conditions, 6.6 gigawatt of solar photovoltaic is deployed, and electric water pump installation capacity increase by 14% (11.3 10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup>h<sup>-1</sup>) relative to current levels. Emission reductions of 85% are achievable at marginal additional cost (+0.7%), whereas reaching net-zero roughly doubles system costs relative to business-as-usual. Renewable-powered electrified irrigation can thus deliver substantial, low-cost emission reductions but requires operational adaptation to solar-based systems.

Nature Communications
IE University (ES), Carnegie Institution for Science (US), ETH Zurich (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.