Disparities Across Race, Ethnicity, and Rurality Among Surgical Patients

Objective: Our study seeks to assess the interplay between race and ethnicity and rurality on surgical outcomes. Background: Disparities in surgical care for rural Americans are well-documented, but little research takes into account the growing racial and ethnic heterogeneity of rural America. Prior studies defining difficulties in access to surgical care have primarily studied “race” and “place” separately. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries who underwent common general surgical procedures between 2016 and 2020. Rurality was defined based on beneficiary residential ZIP codes and corresponding Rural-Urban Commuting Area score 4–10. We used patient and hospital factors for risk adjustment in multivariable logistic regression models to determine rates of postoperative 30-day mortality, complications, serious complications, and unplanned procedures. Results: We identified 325,183 rural and 1,278,405 urban beneficiaries who underwent surgery. After risk adjustment, nonwhite rural patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04–1.18, P = 0.003], complications (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.10–1.19, p < 0.001), and serious complications (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19–1.32, P < 0.001). Rural adjusted rates for 30-day mortality were 6.99% for Nonwhite versus 6.55% for white patients ( P < 0.001), compared to 5.98% for urban Nonwhite versus 5.75% for urban white patients ( P < 0.001). The difference in difference of 0.43% (95% CI: 0.07–0.80) indicated the additive disparity of nonwhite race and rural residence. Conclusions: Nonwhite rural beneficiaries were significantly more likely to experience a postoperative complication and experienced higher rates of 30-day mortality when compared with their white rural counterparts. When compared with urban patients stratified by race or ethnicity, nonwhite rural patients experienced significantly greater mortality disparity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgery Open
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000655
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities Across Race, Ethnicity, and Rurality Among Surgical Patients

Courtney Rentas, Cody Lendon Mullens, Nicholas Kunnath, Andrew M. Ibrahim et al.
Annals of Surgery Open
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Disparities Across Race, Ethnicity, and Rurality Among Surgical Patients

Courtney Rentas, Cody Lendon Mullens, Nicholas Kunnath, Andrew M. Ibrahim, Janice C. Probst, Jamila Picart, Justin B. Dimick
article en

Abstract

Objective: Our study seeks to assess the interplay between race and ethnicity and rurality on surgical outcomes. Background: Disparities in surgical care for rural Americans are well-documented, but little research takes into account the growing racial and ethnic heterogeneity of rural America. Prior studies defining difficulties in access to surgical care have primarily studied “race” and “place” separately. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries who underwent common general surgical procedures between 2016 and 2020. Rurality was defined based on beneficiary residential ZIP codes and corresponding Rural-Urban Commuting Area score 4–10. We used patient and hospital factors for risk adjustment in multivariable logistic regression models to determine rates of postoperative 30-day mortality, complications, serious complications, and unplanned procedures. Results: We identified 325,183 rural and 1,278,405 urban beneficiaries who underwent surgery. After risk adjustment, nonwhite rural patients had higher rates of 30-day mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04–1.18, P = 0.003], complications (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.10–1.19, p < 0.001), and serious complications (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19–1.32, P < 0.001). Rural adjusted rates for 30-day mortality were 6.99% for Nonwhite versus 6.55% for white patients ( P < 0.001), compared to 5.98% for urban Nonwhite versus 5.75% for urban white patients ( P < 0.001). The difference in difference of 0.43% (95% CI: 0.07–0.80) indicated the additive disparity of nonwhite race and rural residence. Conclusions: Nonwhite rural beneficiaries were significantly more likely to experience a postoperative complication and experienced higher rates of 30-day mortality when compared with their white rural counterparts. When compared with urban patients stratified by race or ethnicity, nonwhite rural patients experienced significantly greater mortality disparity.

Annals of Surgery OpenVol. 7(2)
University of South Carolina (US), University of Michigan (US), A. Alfred Taubman Health Care Center (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.