TumorSynth: Integrated Brain Tumor and Tissue Segmentation on Brain MRI Scans of Any Resolution and Contrast

Purpose To develop and validate a deep neural network that simultaneously segments brain tumors and anatomic structures, regardless of the contrast and resolution of the input scans, and can effortlessly adapt to unseen modalities. Materials and Methods The authors included various MRI scans from patients with and without brain tumors from four different datasets. Patient data were divided into a training set and a test set. The authors' method, TumorSynth, combines a Bayesian generative model and a deep learning segmentation model. The generative model creates paired synthetic labels and images with simulated tumors and brain tissues, providing a rich dataset for training the segmentation model. The authors quantitatively compared its performance with that of other widely used methods by calculating Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). Results A total of 1971 patients with and without tumors were included in the study (training set, <i>n</i> = 351 patients; test set, <i>n</i> = 1620 patients). The median DSCs for segmentation (authors' method vs reference standard) were 0.89 (IQR, 0.83-0.95; <i>P</i> < .001) for the unaffected brain volume and 0.89 (IQR, 0.84-0.94; <i>P</i> < .001) for the tumor region. There were no differences in parcellation performance when an MRI sequence was missing (<i>P</i> = .07). In cross-modality validation, the authors' method achieved DSC values of 0.88 for apparent diffusion coefficient, 0.85 for diffusion-weighted imaging, 0.80 for susceptibility-weighted imaging, and 0.79 for fractional anisotropy images. The authors observed a 4% false-positive rate when processing tumor-free MR images. Conclusion The authors developed a deep neural network for brain tumor and tissue segmentation, validated its performance across standard structural MRI sequences, and determined its generalizability to unseen data. <b>Keywords:</b> Segmentation, Neuro-Oncology, CNS, Deep Learning, Neurosurgery <i>Supplemental material is available online for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.250222
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TumorSynth: Integrated Brain Tumor and Tissue Segmentation on Brain MRI Scans of Any Resolution and Contrast

Fenqiang Zhao, L. D. Zhang, Benjamin Billot, Xia Liu et al.
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

TumorSynth: Integrated Brain Tumor and Tissue Segmentation on Brain MRI Scans of Any Resolution and Contrast

Fenqiang Zhao, L. D. Zhang, Benjamin Billot, Xia Liu, Jinyuan Weng, Xiaokang Zhang, Jian Wu, Song Lin, Jun Qiu, Ferran Prados Carrasco, Yaou Liu, Zhizheng Zhuo, Frederik Barkhof, Le Lu, Giuseppe Pontillo, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Junjie Li
article en

Abstract

Purpose To develop and validate a deep neural network that simultaneously segments brain tumors and anatomic structures, regardless of the contrast and resolution of the input scans, and can effortlessly adapt to unseen modalities. Materials and Methods The authors included various MRI scans from patients with and without brain tumors from four different datasets. Patient data were divided into a training set and a test set. The authors' method, TumorSynth, combines a Bayesian generative model and a deep learning segmentation model. The generative model creates paired synthetic labels and images with simulated tumors and brain tissues, providing a rich dataset for training the segmentation model. The authors quantitatively compared its performance with that of other widely used methods by calculating Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). Results A total of 1971 patients with and without tumors were included in the study (training set, <i>n</i> = 351 patients; test set, <i>n</i> = 1620 patients). The median DSCs for segmentation (authors' method vs reference standard) were 0.89 (IQR, 0.83-0.95; <i>P</i> < .001) for the unaffected brain volume and 0.89 (IQR, 0.84-0.94; <i>P</i> < .001) for the tumor region. There were no differences in parcellation performance when an MRI sequence was missing (<i>P</i> = .07). In cross-modality validation, the authors' method achieved DSC values of 0.88 for apparent diffusion coefficient, 0.85 for diffusion-weighted imaging, 0.80 for susceptibility-weighted imaging, and 0.79 for fractional anisotropy images. The authors observed a 4% false-positive rate when processing tumor-free MR images. Conclusion The authors developed a deep neural network for brain tumor and tissue segmentation, validated its performance across standard structural MRI sequences, and determined its generalizability to unseen data. <b>Keywords:</b> Segmentation, Neuro-Oncology, CNS, Deep Learning, Neurosurgery <i>Supplemental material is available online for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2026.

Radiology Imaging CancerVol. 8(2)
Energy Institute (GB), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US), University College London (GB), Alibaba Group (China) (CN), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.