Urine-Based Machine Learning Assay Detects Prostate Cancer

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer testing relies on prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination, which have limited specificity and face cultural or geographic barriers to access. We developed a non-invasive urine-based liquid biopsy assay using engineered hydrogel arrays and machine learning to detect disease-specific biochemical profiles. Methods: We collected voided urine samples from 283 participants at 26 U.S. urology practices prior to prostate biopsy. Random forest classifiers trained on 184 biopsy-confirmed cancer cases and 75 controls analyzed colorimetric signatures. Results: Across all Gleason grades (6–10), the assay achieved 97.8% sensitivity and 53.3% specificity. Performance varied by grade: high-grade cancers showed 97.3% specificity, while low-to-intermediate grades demonstrated 94.0% sensitivity. Conclusions: This accessible, culturally-appropriate platform could expand prostate cancer detection in diverse populations while reducing unnecessary invasive biopsies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16070993
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urine-Based Machine Learning Assay Detects Prostate Cancer

Francis Lim, Obdulio Piloto, Abhignyan Nagesetti, Kyle Ambert et al.
Diagnostics
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Urine-Based Machine Learning Assay Detects Prostate Cancer

Francis Lim, Obdulio Piloto, Abhignyan Nagesetti, Kyle Ambert, Robert Cardwell, Marvin S. Hausman, Muthukarrupan Swaminathan
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer testing relies on prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination, which have limited specificity and face cultural or geographic barriers to access. We developed a non-invasive urine-based liquid biopsy assay using engineered hydrogel arrays and machine learning to detect disease-specific biochemical profiles. Methods: We collected voided urine samples from 283 participants at 26 U.S. urology practices prior to prostate biopsy. Random forest classifiers trained on 184 biopsy-confirmed cancer cases and 75 controls analyzed colorimetric signatures. Results: Across all Gleason grades (6–10), the assay achieved 97.8% sensitivity and 53.3% specificity. Performance varied by grade: high-grade cancers showed 97.3% specificity, while low-to-intermediate grades demonstrated 94.0% sensitivity. Conclusions: This accessible, culturally-appropriate platform could expand prostate cancer detection in diverse populations while reducing unnecessary invasive biopsies.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(7)
Delray Medical Center (US), Renewable Spirits (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Urine-Based Machine Learning Assay Detects Prostate Cancer — Francis Lim, Obdulio Piloto, et al. · Diagnostics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS