Topical RM191A gel for chronic peripheral neuropathic pain: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study

Introduction Current pharmacotherapy options for neuropathic pain (NPP) are limited. RM191A is a novel copper-amino acid complex that mimics superoxide dismutase and has anecdotal evidence for fast-onset analgesia. The aim of this pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a topical gel containing RM191A compared with placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic peripheral NPP. Materials and methods This single-site study was conducted at an Australian pain clinic. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either active or placebo gel, applied four times daily to the painful site for 3 days, followed by a 4-day washout and crossover to the other gel. Co-primary outcomes were changes in the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores for average pain from baseline to Days 1 and 3. Secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability and neuropathic pain characteristics. Results Twenty-seven participants (14 males, 13 females, mean age 67 ± 15 years) were screened, with 25 proceeding to randomization and 24 completing both treatment periods. No first-order ( p = 0.816) or second-order carryover effects ( p = 0.322) were detected. The Day 1 coprimary outcome was not significant ( p = 0.323), but there was a trend toward one-sided statistical significance for the Day 3 coprimary outcome ( p = 0.073). The mean reduction in NPRS Average Pain by Day 3 was significant for the active gel (–0.9 ± 1.6, p = 0.012) but not the placebo (–0.2 ± 1.7, p = 0.485). Post hoc analysis revealed the superiority of the active gel in participants with Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) scores ≥4 ( n = 15, p = 0.047). The number needed to treat (NNT) for 50% pain reduction by Day 3 was 8 (95% CI: greater than 3.9). The active gel was more effective against burning pain, paroxysmal pain, and paraesthesia/dysesthesia than other types of NPP. There were no serious adverse events, while four (16%) participants reported mild skin irritation. Discussion This small pilot RCT found that 3 days of RM191A gel modestly reduced chronic peripheral neuropathic pain. The NNT of 8 compares favorably with topical lidocaine (14.5) and is similar to duloxetine (7.4) and gabapentinoids (8.9). Larger, longer studies in well-defined neuropathic pain populations are warranted. Clinical Trial Registration ANZCTRN 12617000206325. https://www.anzctr.org.au/

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Pain Research
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2026.1772899
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Topical RM191A gel for chronic peripheral neuropathic pain: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study

Charles Brooker, Llewellyn S. Casbolt, Paul A. Glare, Sofia Casbolt et al.
Frontiers in Pain Research
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Topical RM191A gel for chronic peripheral neuropathic pain: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study

Charles Brooker, Llewellyn S. Casbolt, Paul A. Glare, Sofia Casbolt, Daniel J. Costa, Andrew D. Weiss
article en

Abstract

Introduction Current pharmacotherapy options for neuropathic pain (NPP) are limited. RM191A is a novel copper-amino acid complex that mimics superoxide dismutase and has anecdotal evidence for fast-onset analgesia. The aim of this pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a topical gel containing RM191A compared with placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic peripheral NPP. Materials and methods This single-site study was conducted at an Australian pain clinic. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either active or placebo gel, applied four times daily to the painful site for 3 days, followed by a 4-day washout and crossover to the other gel. Co-primary outcomes were changes in the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores for average pain from baseline to Days 1 and 3. Secondary outcomes included safety/tolerability and neuropathic pain characteristics. Results Twenty-seven participants (14 males, 13 females, mean age 67 ± 15 years) were screened, with 25 proceeding to randomization and 24 completing both treatment periods. No first-order ( p = 0.816) or second-order carryover effects ( p = 0.322) were detected. The Day 1 coprimary outcome was not significant ( p = 0.323), but there was a trend toward one-sided statistical significance for the Day 3 coprimary outcome ( p = 0.073). The mean reduction in NPRS Average Pain by Day 3 was significant for the active gel (–0.9 ± 1.6, p = 0.012) but not the placebo (–0.2 ± 1.7, p = 0.485). Post hoc analysis revealed the superiority of the active gel in participants with Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) scores ≥4 ( n = 15, p = 0.047). The number needed to treat (NNT) for 50% pain reduction by Day 3 was 8 (95% CI: greater than 3.9). The active gel was more effective against burning pain, paroxysmal pain, and paraesthesia/dysesthesia than other types of NPP. There were no serious adverse events, while four (16%) participants reported mild skin irritation. Discussion This small pilot RCT found that 3 days of RM191A gel modestly reduced chronic peripheral neuropathic pain. The NNT of 8 compares favorably with topical lidocaine (14.5) and is similar to duloxetine (7.4) and gabapentinoids (8.9). Larger, longer studies in well-defined neuropathic pain populations are warranted. Clinical Trial Registration ANZCTRN 12617000206325. https://www.anzctr.org.au/

Frontiers in Pain ResearchVol. 7
The University of Sydney (AU), Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU), Management Research Institute (US), Edwards Lifesciences (Switzerland) (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.