Online and traditional mindfulness-based interventions for stress in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis versus control conditions

Objective Empirical evidence verifies the efficacy of mindfulness interventions in addressing heterogeneous stress forms across clinical and non-clinical populations. However, online mindfulness is increasingly emerging in diverse modalities across online platforms, propelled by ongoing technological advancements. This study aims to conduct a systematic analysis of the intervention effects of online versus traditional mindfulness in alleviating stress among university students. It is important to note that this review compares online and traditional formats indirectly, by synthesizing trials that separately compare each format against a control condition, as head-to-head RCTs directly comparing both formats were not eligible for inclusion. Methods Four databases were selected as data sources: Web of Science, Embase, Medline and PsycINFO. A total of 4,387 articles were included based on the PICOS framework established a priori , and 16 articles were ultimately incorporated into the meta-analysis. During data analysis, article quality was appraised utilizing the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, with data extraction performed in Microsoft Excel and statistical analyses conducted in Stata. Results Analysis of the included studies indicated that online mindfulness interventions (SMD = −0.56; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.36) effectively reduced stress in university students, with traditional mindfulness interventions (SMD = −0.64; 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.46) demonstrating comparable results. For improving mindfulness among university students, both online mindfulness (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.76) and traditional mindfulness (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.59) yield positive outcomes. Conclusion The results demonstrated that both online and traditional mindfulness effectively reduce university students’ stress and enhance their mindfulness levels. And the effects of these two intervention methods are comparable. Therefore, online mindfulness may serve as a viable and similarly effective alternative to traditional mindfulness for stress reduction among college students. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251025123 , CRD420251025123.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1755245
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online and traditional mindfulness-based interventions for stress in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis versus control conditions

Chien-Chih Wang, Weiguo Qu, Ze Peng, Yurong Hu et al.
Frontiers in Psychology
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Online and traditional mindfulness-based interventions for stress in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis versus control conditions

Chien-Chih Wang, Weiguo Qu, Ze Peng, Yurong Hu, Hongcheng Liu
article en

Abstract

Objective Empirical evidence verifies the efficacy of mindfulness interventions in addressing heterogeneous stress forms across clinical and non-clinical populations. However, online mindfulness is increasingly emerging in diverse modalities across online platforms, propelled by ongoing technological advancements. This study aims to conduct a systematic analysis of the intervention effects of online versus traditional mindfulness in alleviating stress among university students. It is important to note that this review compares online and traditional formats indirectly, by synthesizing trials that separately compare each format against a control condition, as head-to-head RCTs directly comparing both formats were not eligible for inclusion. Methods Four databases were selected as data sources: Web of Science, Embase, Medline and PsycINFO. A total of 4,387 articles were included based on the PICOS framework established a priori , and 16 articles were ultimately incorporated into the meta-analysis. During data analysis, article quality was appraised utilizing the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, with data extraction performed in Microsoft Excel and statistical analyses conducted in Stata. Results Analysis of the included studies indicated that online mindfulness interventions (SMD = −0.56; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.36) effectively reduced stress in university students, with traditional mindfulness interventions (SMD = −0.64; 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.46) demonstrating comparable results. For improving mindfulness among university students, both online mindfulness (SMD = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.76) and traditional mindfulness (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.59) yield positive outcomes. Conclusion The results demonstrated that both online and traditional mindfulness effectively reduce university students’ stress and enhance their mindfulness levels. And the effects of these two intervention methods are comparable. Therefore, online mindfulness may serve as a viable and similarly effective alternative to traditional mindfulness for stress reduction among college students. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251025123 , CRD420251025123.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Hunan Normal University (CN), Institut Teknologi PLN
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.