State Terminology and Knowledge Production on Chinese Indonesians: a Bibliometric Analysis of the ‘Cina’ Term (1968–2013)

ABSTRACT This study aims to map and analyse the development of academic studies on Chinese Indonesians before the removal of the term ‘Cina’ and its replacement with ‘Tionghoa’ in 2014. Using a bibliometric approach, this study examines 292 documents indexed in the Scopus database between 1968 and 2013. The research results show that publication production developed unevenly. The number of publications, which was relatively low and sporadic during the early New Order era, increased significantly in the late 1990s in line with political changes, the economic crisis and the strengthening of public discourse on ethnic relations. These findings suggest that academic knowledge production before 2014 was still influenced by state terminology and discourse institutionalised through the term ‘Cina’, which contributed to the framing of ethnic Chinese as a problematic category. This study asserts that the shift in terminology is not merely a linguistic correction but has the potential to mark an epistemic transformation. However, identity politics and populism in 2017 proved that negative sentiments and stereotypes towards Chinese Indonesians still exist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sena.70039
Primary Topic
Asian Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Terminology and Knowledge Production on Chinese Indonesians: a Bibliometric Analysis of the ‘Cina’ Term (1968–2013)

Anju Nofarof Hasudungan, Zeffry Alkatiri, R. Tuty Nur Mutia
Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism
Asian Studies and History
article

State Terminology and Knowledge Production on Chinese Indonesians: a Bibliometric Analysis of the ‘Cina’ Term (1968–2013)

Anju Nofarof Hasudungan, Zeffry Alkatiri, R. Tuty Nur Mutia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to map and analyse the development of academic studies on Chinese Indonesians before the removal of the term ‘Cina’ and its replacement with ‘Tionghoa’ in 2014. Using a bibliometric approach, this study examines 292 documents indexed in the Scopus database between 1968 and 2013. The research results show that publication production developed unevenly. The number of publications, which was relatively low and sporadic during the early New Order era, increased significantly in the late 1990s in line with political changes, the economic crisis and the strengthening of public discourse on ethnic relations. These findings suggest that academic knowledge production before 2014 was still influenced by state terminology and discourse institutionalised through the term ‘Cina’, which contributed to the framing of ethnic Chinese as a problematic category. This study asserts that the shift in terminology is not merely a linguistic correction but has the potential to mark an epistemic transformation. However, identity politics and populism in 2017 proved that negative sentiments and stereotypes towards Chinese Indonesians still exist.

Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism
University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Asian Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

State Terminology and Knowledge Production on Chinese Indonesians: a Bibliometric Analysis of the ‘Cina’ Term (1968–2013) — Anju Nofarof Hasudungan, Zeffry Alkatiri, et al. · Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS