Communal coping among African Americans: a comparison of romantic and non-romantic dyads

There is a great deal of research linking communal coping to good relationship and health outcomes. However, this research has neglected to examine dyads other than romantic couples, and research on underrepresented groups is sparse. The goal of this exploratory study was to compare communal coping (shared appraisal, collaboration) among Black persons with romantic partners to Black persons with other close relationship partners. First, we compared levels of communal coping and outcomes between the two groups. Romantic dyads reported greater communal coping and greater support provision than non-romantic dyads, but non-romantic dyads reported greater intimacy than romantic dyads. Second, we examined the implications of the two components of communal coping for relationship and health outcomes and tested whether these relations were the same for the two groups. Results showed links of own communal coping to better relationship outcomes for both patients and dyad partners. There was some suggestion that these beneficial links are stronger among romantic than non-romantic couples, and that patients may benefit in particular from dyad partner communal coping. There was some evidence for benefits of communal coping on psychological health, but little evidence for benefits on diabetes outcomes—and these findings generalized across both groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-026-00658-2
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communal coping among African Americans: a comparison of romantic and non-romantic dyads

Vicki S. Helgeson, Abigail Kunz Vaughn, MarQia Allen
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

Communal coping among African Americans: a comparison of romantic and non-romantic dyads

Vicki S. Helgeson, Abigail Kunz Vaughn, MarQia Allen
article en

Abstract

There is a great deal of research linking communal coping to good relationship and health outcomes. However, this research has neglected to examine dyads other than romantic couples, and research on underrepresented groups is sparse. The goal of this exploratory study was to compare communal coping (shared appraisal, collaboration) among Black persons with romantic partners to Black persons with other close relationship partners. First, we compared levels of communal coping and outcomes between the two groups. Romantic dyads reported greater communal coping and greater support provision than non-romantic dyads, but non-romantic dyads reported greater intimacy than romantic dyads. Second, we examined the implications of the two components of communal coping for relationship and health outcomes and tested whether these relations were the same for the two groups. Results showed links of own communal coping to better relationship outcomes for both patients and dyad partners. There was some suggestion that these beneficial links are stronger among romantic than non-romantic couples, and that patients may benefit in particular from dyad partner communal coping. There was some evidence for benefits of communal coping on psychological health, but little evidence for benefits on diabetes outcomes—and these findings generalized across both groups.

Journal of Behavioral Medicine
North Carolina State University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.