Does “Precocious Research Creativity” Account for Notable Late-Career Research Achievements by Political Scientists?

ABSTRACT This article offers the first test with valid measures and rigorous multivariate methods of the hypothesis that significant early-career research achievements of academics predict late-career achievements of the same type. Considerable research investigated the correlates of late-career research success; however, this promising hypothesis that originated in psychological and educational research on adolescents has not been tested systematically for academic careers. In a sample of three annual temporal cohorts of political science faculty members, our study finds notable evidence in support of this hypothesis. Our findings also provide a foundation for future research on how innate abilities, the character of doctoral programs, and the advantages of different types of academic positions shape long-term career productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PS Political Science & Politics
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096526102017
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does “Precocious Research Creativity” Account for Notable Late-Career Research Achievements by Political Scientists?

Soren Jordan, Kim Hill
PS Political Science & Politics
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Does “Precocious Research Creativity” Account for Notable Late-Career Research Achievements by Political Scientists?

Soren Jordan, Kim Hill
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article offers the first test with valid measures and rigorous multivariate methods of the hypothesis that significant early-career research achievements of academics predict late-career achievements of the same type. Considerable research investigated the correlates of late-career research success; however, this promising hypothesis that originated in psychological and educational research on adolescents has not been tested systematically for academic careers. In a sample of three annual temporal cohorts of political science faculty members, our study finds notable evidence in support of this hypothesis. Our findings also provide a foundation for future research on how innate abilities, the character of doctoral programs, and the advantages of different types of academic positions shape long-term career productivity.

PS Political Science & Politics
Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.