Comparative analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic right hepatectomy: propensity score matching and machine learning analysis for outcome prediction

Background Robotic right hepatectomy (RRH) is increasingly utilized as a minimally invasive liver surgery approach, yet its comparative effectiveness against laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) remains debated. Complication prediction is crucial to efficiently choice the approach. This study aimed to compare RRH and LRH using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis and assess the predictive power of machine learning (ML), focusing on Random Forest-based feature selection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing RRH and LRH, performing a 1:1 PSM based on preoperative characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were compared, and significant predictors of textbook outcomes (TO) were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis. A Random Forest model was developed, selecting key variables for TO achieving prediction. Results After PSM, 30 RRH and 30 LRH patients were compared. RRH was associated with increased clamping (80% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.0001) and longer clamping duration (44 min vs. 35 min, p = 0.209) but resulted in a shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 7.5 days, p = 0.004) and fewer complications (13.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Robotic surgical approach (OR 0.282, p = 0.004), Chronic hepatitis/Cirrhosis (OR 1.90, p = 0.034), and estimated blood loss (OR 2.001, p = 0.014) as significant predictors of TO. Feature selection via ML confirmed robotic surgical approach as one of the most relevant factors, alongside operative duration, estimated blood loss, and lesion size, in determining postoperative outcomes. Conclusion The choice of surgical approach is a key determinant of outcomes, as demonstrated by its significance in both multivariate analysis and ML-based feature selection. RRH shows potential advantages in reducing hospital stay and complications while requiring more intraoperative management. Machine learning, particularly Random Forest, enhances outcome prediction by identifying critical surgical factors, supporting a more tailored approach in hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Surgery
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1739640
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic right hepatectomy: propensity score matching and machine learning analysis for outcome prediction

Gianluca Mennini, O. Soubrane, Alessandro Mazzotta, Federico Baldisseri et al.
Frontiers in Surgery
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Comparative analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic right hepatectomy: propensity score matching and machine learning analysis for outcome prediction

Gianluca Mennini, O. Soubrane, Alessandro Mazzotta, Federico Baldisseri, Diab Samer, Giacomo Salina, Nicola De’ Angelis, F. Izzo, A. Belli, Paolo Magistri, Patrick Pessaux, Tullio Piardi, Riccardo Memeo, Graziano Ceccarelli, Francesca Ratti, Michele Ammendola, Michele Tedeschi, Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Luca Aldrighetti
article en

Abstract

Background Robotic right hepatectomy (RRH) is increasingly utilized as a minimally invasive liver surgery approach, yet its comparative effectiveness against laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) remains debated. Complication prediction is crucial to efficiently choice the approach. This study aimed to compare RRH and LRH using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis and assess the predictive power of machine learning (ML), focusing on Random Forest-based feature selection. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing RRH and LRH, performing a 1:1 PSM based on preoperative characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were compared, and significant predictors of textbook outcomes (TO) were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis. A Random Forest model was developed, selecting key variables for TO achieving prediction. Results After PSM, 30 RRH and 30 LRH patients were compared. RRH was associated with increased clamping (80% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.0001) and longer clamping duration (44 min vs. 35 min, p = 0.209) but resulted in a shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 7.5 days, p = 0.004) and fewer complications (13.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Robotic surgical approach (OR 0.282, p = 0.004), Chronic hepatitis/Cirrhosis (OR 1.90, p = 0.034), and estimated blood loss (OR 2.001, p = 0.014) as significant predictors of TO. Feature selection via ML confirmed robotic surgical approach as one of the most relevant factors, alongside operative duration, estimated blood loss, and lesion size, in determining postoperative outcomes. Conclusion The choice of surgical approach is a key determinant of outcomes, as demonstrated by its significance in both multivariate analysis and ML-based feature selection. RRH shows potential advantages in reducing hospital stay and complications while requiring more intraoperative management. Machine learning, particularly Random Forest, enhances outcome prediction by identifying critical surgical factors, supporting a more tailored approach in hepatobiliary surgery.

Frontiers in SurgeryVol. 13
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Magna Graecia University (IT), Institute Mutualiste Montsouris (FR), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista (IT), Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), Ospedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli (IT), Center for Special Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery (US), Ospedale Vito Fazzi (IT), Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg (FR), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.