Comparison of Quality Control Models for Multiple Instruments: A Simulation Study using Real-world Data

ceptable limits in the absence of certified reference materials or reference measurement procedures (MPs) [1, 2].Although recent discussion of harmonization have primarily focused on aligning results across different MPs, the broader concept also encompasses the achievement of equivalent results across multiple instruments within a single laboratory.This may be regarded as intra-laboratory harmonization, reflecting inter-instrument comparability.When results are not harmonized across instruments within the same laboratory, the identical sample may yield different results, potentially leading to erroneous clinical, financial, or technical decisions.Laboratory quality control (QC) is critical for monitoring the accuracy and precision of the analytical process by detecting systematic or random errors that may affect patient results and decision-making [3].For internal QC, it is important to design a QC

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Medicine Online
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47429/lmo.2026.16.2.122
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Quality Control Models for Multiple Instruments: A Simulation Study using Real-world Data

Hanmil Jang, Heekang Choi, Jiho Jang, John Hoon Rim et al.
Laboratory Medicine Online
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Comparison of Quality Control Models for Multiple Instruments: A Simulation Study using Real-world Data

Hanmil Jang, Heekang Choi, Jiho Jang, John Hoon Rim, Jong-Baeck Lim, Hyein Kang
article en

Abstract

ceptable limits in the absence of certified reference materials or reference measurement procedures (MPs) [1, 2].Although recent discussion of harmonization have primarily focused on aligning results across different MPs, the broader concept also encompasses the achievement of equivalent results across multiple instruments within a single laboratory.This may be regarded as intra-laboratory harmonization, reflecting inter-instrument comparability.When results are not harmonized across instruments within the same laboratory, the identical sample may yield different results, potentially leading to erroneous clinical, financial, or technical decisions.Laboratory quality control (QC) is critical for monitoring the accuracy and precision of the analytical process by detecting systematic or random errors that may affect patient results and decision-making [3].For internal QC, it is important to design a QC

Laboratory Medicine OnlineVol. 16(2)
Yonsei University (KR), Severance Hospital (KR), Keimyung University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.