Prognostic Significance of Intraindividual CT and MRI LI-RADS Agreement and Discordance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose To assess the intraindividual concordance and discordance in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorizations between CT and MRI for surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate their association with early postsurgical recurrence. Materials and Methods This dual-center retrospective study included patients who underwent both CT and MRI before hepatic resection for HCC between January 2016 and December 2020. For each HCC lesion, the LI-RADS category was independently assigned at CT and MRI. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between the CT and MRI LI-RADS categorizations (LI-RADS category M [LR-M] vs LI-RADS category 4 or 5 [LR-4/5]) and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. Patients were classified into three groups according to the CT or MRI LI-RADS categorization: LR-M at both CT and MRI, at only one modality, or at neither CT or MRI. The 2-year RFS was compared among the groups. Results A total of 319 patients (mean age, 58.8 years ± 9.7 [SD]; 248 male patients) were included, with HCC lesions of 114 (35.7%) patients showing discrepant CT or MRI LI-RADS categorizations. LR-M categorization was more common at MRI than at CT (21.6% vs 6.0%; <i>P</i> < .001). Both CT (hazard ratio, 2.24; <i>P</i> = .03) and MRI (hazard ratio, 2.33; <i>P</i> = .002) LR-M categorizations were independently associated with the 2-year RFS rate. The 2-year RFS rate was lowest, intermediate, and highest in patients with HCC lesions categorized as LR-M at both modalities (33.3%), only one modality (63.3%), and neither modality (82.8%), respectively (<i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion LI-RADS categorization of HCC often differed between CT and MRI. LR-M categorization at either modality was independently associated with 2-year RFS, with the lowest survival observed when lesions were classified as LR-M with both modalities. <b>Keywords:</b> Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, CT, MRI, Prognosis <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.250645
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Significance of Intraindividual CT and MRI LI-RADS Agreement and Discordance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Yong Jun Jung, Sang Hyun Choi, Ju Hyun Shim, In Hye Song et al.
Radiology Imaging Cancer
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Prognostic Significance of Intraindividual CT and MRI LI-RADS Agreement and Discordance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Yong Jun Jung, Sang Hyun Choi, Ju Hyun Shim, In Hye Song, Seung Soo Lee, Subin Heo, Seokhwi Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose To assess the intraindividual concordance and discordance in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorizations between CT and MRI for surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate their association with early postsurgical recurrence. Materials and Methods This dual-center retrospective study included patients who underwent both CT and MRI before hepatic resection for HCC between January 2016 and December 2020. For each HCC lesion, the LI-RADS category was independently assigned at CT and MRI. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between the CT and MRI LI-RADS categorizations (LI-RADS category M [LR-M] vs LI-RADS category 4 or 5 [LR-4/5]) and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. Patients were classified into three groups according to the CT or MRI LI-RADS categorization: LR-M at both CT and MRI, at only one modality, or at neither CT or MRI. The 2-year RFS was compared among the groups. Results A total of 319 patients (mean age, 58.8 years ± 9.7 [SD]; 248 male patients) were included, with HCC lesions of 114 (35.7%) patients showing discrepant CT or MRI LI-RADS categorizations. LR-M categorization was more common at MRI than at CT (21.6% vs 6.0%; <i>P</i> < .001). Both CT (hazard ratio, 2.24; <i>P</i> = .03) and MRI (hazard ratio, 2.33; <i>P</i> = .002) LR-M categorizations were independently associated with the 2-year RFS rate. The 2-year RFS rate was lowest, intermediate, and highest in patients with HCC lesions categorized as LR-M at both modalities (33.3%), only one modality (63.3%), and neither modality (82.8%), respectively (<i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion LI-RADS categorization of HCC often differed between CT and MRI. LR-M categorization at either modality was independently associated with 2-year RFS, with the lowest survival observed when lesions were classified as LR-M with both modalities. <b>Keywords:</b> Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, CT, MRI, Prognosis <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA 2026.

Radiology Imaging CancerVol. 8(2)
Ulsan College (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Ajou University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.