Comparison of Leak Localization and Quantification Methods for Compressed Air Systems Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Compressed air leakages represent a major source of energy waste and financial loss in industrial facilities. However, accurately detecting and quantifying these leaks remains challenging due to the wide variation in the accuracy, cost, usability, and practical applicability of available methods. This paper presents a structured review and evaluation of leakage localization and quantification methods for compressed air systems (CASs), categorized into hardware-, software-, and non-technical-based approaches. Based on expert interviews and a comprehensive literature review, a set of evaluation criteria was defined and applied within a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to derive criteria weights, while the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was employed to rank the alternatives separately for localization and quantification tasks. To enhance practical relevance, five expert interviews were conducted with industrial stakeholders from diverse professional backgrounds, including maintenance engineers and energy managers. A questionnaire was also distributed to assess the methods. The results provide illustrative insights into the relative suitability of different methods. Within the scope of this exploratory study, from a practical industrial perspective, the compressor duty cycle method and non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) appear to be promising approaches to leakage quantification, while ultrasonic detection is preferred for localization. Notably, discrepancies between questionnaire-based rankings and expert interview insights highlight the limitations of purely survey-driven evaluations. The proposed framework supports industrial decision-makers in selecting leakage detection and quantification methods by balancing technical performance, implementation effort, and operational constraints, thereby contributing to reduced energy losses and improved system efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-03-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19071658
Primary Topic
Water Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Leak Localization and Quantification Methods for Compressed Air Systems Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Alireza Hojjati, Peter Radgen
Energies
Water Systems and Optimization
article

Comparison of Leak Localization and Quantification Methods for Compressed Air Systems Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Alireza Hojjati, Peter Radgen
article en

Abstract

Compressed air leakages represent a major source of energy waste and financial loss in industrial facilities. However, accurately detecting and quantifying these leaks remains challenging due to the wide variation in the accuracy, cost, usability, and practical applicability of available methods. This paper presents a structured review and evaluation of leakage localization and quantification methods for compressed air systems (CASs), categorized into hardware-, software-, and non-technical-based approaches. Based on expert interviews and a comprehensive literature review, a set of evaluation criteria was defined and applied within a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to derive criteria weights, while the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was employed to rank the alternatives separately for localization and quantification tasks. To enhance practical relevance, five expert interviews were conducted with industrial stakeholders from diverse professional backgrounds, including maintenance engineers and energy managers. A questionnaire was also distributed to assess the methods. The results provide illustrative insights into the relative suitability of different methods. Within the scope of this exploratory study, from a practical industrial perspective, the compressor duty cycle method and non-intrusive load monitoring (NILM) appear to be promising approaches to leakage quantification, while ultrasonic detection is preferred for localization. Notably, discrepancies between questionnaire-based rankings and expert interview insights highlight the limitations of purely survey-driven evaluations. The proposed framework supports industrial decision-makers in selecting leakage detection and quantification methods by balancing technical performance, implementation effort, and operational constraints, thereby contributing to reduced energy losses and improved system efficiency.

EnergiesVol. 19(7)
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Water Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.